review

Solid

Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

AI & Automation 496 stars 41 forks Updated 1 months ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 86/100

Stars 20%
90
Recency 20%
75
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /review - Code Review Workflow Multi-perspective code review with parallel specialists. ## When to Use - "Review this code" - "Review my PR" - "Check this before I merge" - "Get feedback on implementation" - Before merging significant changes - Quality gates ## Workflow Overview ``` ┌──────────┐ │ critic │ ─┐ │ (code) │ │ └──────────┘ │ │ ┌──────────┐ │ ┌──────────────┐ │plan-reviewer│ ─┼────▶ │ review-agent │ │ (plan) │ │ │ (synthesis) │ └──────────┘ │ └──────────────┘ │ ┌──────────┐ │ │plan-reviewer│ ─┘ │ (change) │ └──────────┘ Parallel Sequential perspectives synthesis ``` ## Agent Sequence | # | Agent | Focus | Execution | |---|-------|-------|-----------| | 1 | **critic** | Code quality, patterns, readability | Parallel | | 1 | **plan-reviewer** | Architecture, plan adherence | Parallel | | 1 | **plan-reviewer** | Change impact, risk assessment | Parallel | | 2 | **review-agent** | Synthesize all reviews, final verdict | After 1 | ## Review Perspectives - **critic**: Is this good code? (Style, patterns, readability) - **plan-reviewer**: Does this match the design? (Architecture, plan) - **plan-reviewer**: Is this change safe? (Risk, impact, regressions) - **review-agent**: Overall assessm...

Details

Author
vibeeval
Repository
vibeeval/vibecosystem
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
1 months ago
Language
C#
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

review

Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

3,795 Updated 4 months ago
parcadei
Code & Development Listed

ai-review

Reviews code changes with human-quality judgment: PR reviews, file reviews, diff analysis, architecture feedback. Default mode runs the full specialist roster through 3 macro-agents; pass `--full` for one agent per specialist. Trigger for 'review this', 'give me feedback', 'look over my PR', 'any issues with this', 'is this merge-ready'. Not for evidence-backed gates; use /ai-verify instead. Not for narrative writing; use /ai-prose instead.

49 Updated today
arcasilesgroup
Code & Development Listed

sop-code-review

Comprehensive code review workflow coordinating quality, security, performance, and documentation reviewers. 4-hour timeline for thorough multi-agent review.

335 Updated today
aiskillstore
Code & Development Solid

review-code

Full code review: launches `/review-test-coverage`, `/review-correctness`, `/review-security`, `/review-quality`, `/review-api-usage`, and `/peer-review` in parallel and returns combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my code", "full code review", "review my changes", or wants a comprehensive code review.

314 Updated today
tobihagemann
AI & Automation Listed

deep-review

Adversarial code review with three parallel perspectives — Advocate, Skeptic, Architect — that create productive tension. Use for high-stakes PRs, architectural changes, or when single-pass review would miss issues. Surfaces findings through disagreement, not consensus.

0 Updated yesterday
fabioc-aloha