paper-polish-pipelinelisted

Staged, diagnosis-driven academic paper polishing pipeline (bilingual 中文/English). Use to revise a paper from rough draft to final submission across ordered stages: diagnose first, then optimize section by section, derive abstract/contributions from the revised body, polish the language to reduce AI-sounding phrasing, and run a pre-submission/defense risk check. Enforces research-integrity guardrails: no fabricated references/data, no overclaiming, correlation is not causation, limited samples are not universal laws, and missing information is flagged not invented. Works for thesis, journal, course paper, and grant proposal. Also trigger on Chinese phrasings like 论文润色、论文修改、论文诊断、降AI味、降低AI味、引言重构、文献综述优化、研究方法规范、结果讨论深化、摘要提炼、创新点提炼、答辩问题预测、投稿前检查、终稿风险检查、毕业论文修改、期刊论文润色.
tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills · ★ 1 · Data & Documents · score 64

Install: claude install-skill tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills

# Paper Polish Pipeline / 论文润色全流程 ## Overview / 概述 A multi-stage workflow for revising an academic paper from rough draft to final copy. Rather than polishing sentences, it works through the paper in order: first diagnose the real problems, then fix structure and logic, and write the abstract and contributions only once the body is settled, before a final language pass and a pre-submission check. 本 skill 按顺序修改论文,把它从初稿带到终稿。它不是逐句润色,而是先诊断定位真正的问题, 再改结构与逻辑,正文定稿后才提炼摘要与创新点,最后做语言精修和投稿/答辩前的风险检查。它服务于真实研究者的定稿流程,不替作者编造内容。 Applicable to / 适用: 毕业论文 thesis · 期刊论文 journal article · 课程论文 course paper · 项目申请书 grant proposal. --- ## IRON RULES — Research Integrity (HIGHEST PRIORITY) / 学术诚信铁律(最高优先级) These rules apply to **every** stage and override any stylistic goal. Later stage templates may specialize them but must never weaken them. 以下规则适用于所有阶段,优先级最高。 1. **No fabrication / 不虚构.** Never invent references, authors, years, datasets, data values, equipment, parameters, sample sizes, software versions, experimental steps, or figure/table contents. 绝不新增原文没有的文献、作者、年份、数据、设备、参数、样本量、软件版本、实验步骤或图表信息。 2. **Flag gaps, don't fill them / 缺信息要标注,不要编造.** When the source lacks needed information, mark it as `【此处需补充……】` / `[TO BE ADDED: …]` and move on. 3. **No overclaiming / 不夸大.** Avoid "填补空白 / fills a gap", "具有重大意义 / of great significance", "首次提出 / first to propose", "颠覆性 / disruptive" unless the source already proves it. Never turn an incremental improvement into a breakthrough.