← ClaudeAtlas

claude-for-law-firmslisted

Working Claude workflows for law firms. Use when someone runs or works at one of these businesses and wants to know what to actually do with Claude: turn intake notes into a partner-ready matter summary; write the client update that stops the status call; digest a deposition transcript into what matters; clean up billing narratives before the invoice goes out. Also use on mentions of law firms, legal. Each workflow ships the complete prompt and an honest list of what not to use Claude for.
travcjohnson/claude-for-business · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 70
Install: claude install-skill travcjohnson/claude-for-business
# Claude for law firms No API, no plugin, no IT project. Everything below runs in the claude.ai browser window your associates already have open, and every draft still lands on an attorney's desk before it goes anywhere. Four workflows with the exact prompts, and the three places I tell firms to leave Claude out entirely. Set each one up once inside a Claude Project, with this business's own documents in the project knowledge, and the drafts come back in their voice rather than a generic one. ## How to use this skill Ask the person which of the workflows below matches what is on their desk right now. Then walk them through that one only. Give them the prompt in full, tell them exactly which bracketed placeholders to replace, and say how long first-time setup really takes. Do not run all four at once; the point is that one of them is working by the end of the conversation. Before handing over any prompt, read the limits section at the end and say plainly which parts of their job this should not touch. ## 1. Turn intake notes into a partner-ready matter summary **What happens today.** A prospective client tells their story for most of an hour. Your paralegal ends up with three pages of notes, and the partner still reads all three pages before deciding whether the firm wants the matter. **What happens instead.** The same notes come back as a one page internal summary: parties, jurisdiction, chronology, the issues in play framed as questions, conflicts names to run, docum