an-oracle-ceiling-is-not-headroom-yet

Solid

Use at hypothesis generation, study design and implementation once a submission exists and you are choosing where the remaining hours go -- in particular when a lever looks worth building because you worked out what it would pay if its setting were chosen perfectly for every row, or when the distance between your metric value and a published number for this dataset and metric looks like room to improve. Covers computing that best-possible value as an explicit ceiling, inverting it into the correlation a real predictor would need before it clears your ship bar, measuring the correlation your inputs actually carry, and checking that a published number you are chasing was computed the way your submission will be scored.

AI & Automation 805 stars 25 forks Updated 2 weeks ago NOASSERTION

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
97
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# An oracle ceiling is not headroom until the input predicts the oracle's choice The most persuasive number a run produces about itself is a ceiling: hold everything fixed, let one degree of freedom take its best possible value on every row, re-score. "+0.0276 available from getting the output length right per example" is concrete, measured, and reads in a plan like a plan. It is also computed with the label in hand, and that is the whole problem. A ceiling says how far the metric *would* move. It says nothing about whether anything you are allowed to see moves with it. Turning one into a decision takes four cheap steps, and the two in the middle are the ones that get skipped. ## 1. The ceiling Replace the lever with its per-row optimum, everything else fixed, and score. On a subsample this is minutes. Do it per lever **and** for the levers jointly, because they overlap: in one measured case two levers were worth +0.0276 and +0.0118 alone and +0.0419 together — which is close to saying the second is the first one wearing a different name, and a plan that budgets an hour for each has double-counted. ## 2. Invert the ceiling into the correlation you would need You will never reach the ceiling; you will reach some fraction of it set by how well you can predict the oracle's per-row choice. So simulate that directly. Build synthetic predictors of the oracle's choice at a ladder of target correlations ρ = 0.1, 0.2, … 0.9 — take the oracle's own choice and add noise scaled to ...

Details

Author
tangxiangru
Repository
tangxiangru/AutoR
Created
6 months ago
Last Updated
2 weeks ago
Language
Python
License
NOASSERTION

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Listed

orchestrate-evidence-retrieval-expert

Design and defend the evidence column. Use when building retrieval or considering a ranker change. Covers the ceiling analysis that tells you whether a gain is possible at all, and why the fashionable option often loses.

3 Updated 1 months ago
NITISH-R-G
AI & Automation Solid

calibrate-the-level-on-the-window-you-cannot-score

Use at implementation and afterwards whenever the rows you will be scored on lie outside every window you can check against truth — a forecast horizon that starts where the supplied history ends, a later time period, a different site, batch or cohort, a test split whose label column has been removed — and your only bias check was run on a backtest fold or a random validation split. Covers why "my predictions are unbiased" is a statement about the folds and not about the graded rows, how to measure the overall level of your predictions on the graded rows with no labels at all, why the level ratio is only the alarm and a metric scan is the number, what to do when the two windows disagree, and when a low forecast is correct rather than broken.

805 Updated 2 weeks ago
tangxiangru
AI & Automation Solid

a-second-model-family-before-a-fifth-sample

Use at literature survey, study design, implementation and experimentation when the predictions come from running a pretrained checkpoint you picked off the shelf over each row — a language model that reads the text and answers, an encoder, any released artifact — rather than from fitting a model on the training rows, and especially when the next thing you planned is another sample, seed, temperature or voter from the checkpoint you already downloaded. Covers treating the set of checkpoints as an experimental axis with a deadline of its own, the best-single / oracle / best-vote measurement on your own labelled rows that decides whether to buy a better aggregator or a different model, and why a ceiling computed from your own predictions bounds your shortlist rather than the task.

805 Updated 2 weeks ago
tangxiangru