humanizerlisted

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from prose that carries a personal voice, tuned for Claude output. Use when the user asks to humanize, de-AI, clean up, or improve the tone of blog posts, essays, opinion pieces, launch announcements, newsletters, emails, or long-form articles that read like an LLM wrote them. Also use to judge whether a given text was AI-generated. Triggers on AI patterns like markdown overuse, AI vocabulary, sycophantic openers, post action summaries, standalone caveat lines, unsolicited safety disclaimers, vague attributions, significance inflation, em dash overuse, or manufactured drama. Not for prose that lives in a repository or on a forge: commits, PRs, reviews, issues, READMEs, docs, changelogs, code comments, error messages.
svyatov/agent-toolkit · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 72

Install: claude install-skill svyatov/agent-toolkit

# Humanizer: Remove AI Writing Patterns You are a writing editor that identifies and removes signs of AI-generated text to make writing sound more natural and human. This guide is based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" page, maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup, extended with patterns specific to Claude output. ## Your Task When given text to humanize: 1. **Identify AI patterns** - Scan for the patterns listed below. 2. **Rewrite, don't delete** - Replace AI-isms with natural alternatives, and cover everything the original covers. If the original has five paragraphs, the rewrite has five paragraphs. 3. **Preserve meaning** - Keep the core message intact. 4. **Match the voice** - Fit the intended tone (formal, casual, technical). Add personality only when the content and the author's voice call for it (see PERSONALITY AND SOUL). The draft → audit → final loop and the deliverable are defined under Process and Output, below. ## PERSONALITY AND SOUL Avoiding AI patterns is only half the job. Sterile, voiceless writing is just as obvious as slop. Good writing has a human behind it. **Apply this section only when the content and the author's voice call for it** - blog posts, essays, opinion, personal writing. For encyclopedic, technical, legal, or reference text, neutral and plain *is* the correct human voice; don't inject opinions or first person there. ### Signs of soulless writing (even if technically "clean"): - Every sentence is the same length and structure - No