simulate-userlisted

Cast the reviewer into a strict roleplay as a user persona or stakeholder reacting to an artifact (draft email, pitch deck, UI flow, policy memo, marketing copy, instructional text). The output is an in-character reaction — not a review — that shows how the artifact lands. Use when the user says "simulate a skeptical engineer," "simulate an impatient executive," "how would a non-technical user react to this," "play a confused customer reading this," "roleplay a skeptical engineer responding to this proposal," "what would a compliance officer say about this," "have the reviewer pretend to be a specific persona," or any cast-into-roleplay framing. Also offer this proactively when the active primary is about to ship a draft (email, deck, copy, instructions) to an audience where framing matters and the audience is non-technical, time-pressed, skeptical, hostile, or otherwise different from the author's defaults.
sumitake/agent-collab · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 65

Install: claude install-skill sumitake/agent-collab

## Unified runtime invocation Resolve the **plugin root** from this loaded file: `SKILL.md` is at `<plugin-root>/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md`. Invoke only `python3 "<plugin-root>/coordinator.py"` and send one bounded JSON request on stdin. Before constructing it, read the **Coordinator request schema** in `<plugin-root>/README.md`; never invent fields or route/action pairs. The public coordinator re-observes the active host/model, captures artifact provenance, excludes same-family routes, and verifies the co-packaged native manifest. It runs standalone from the installed plugin. Never discover a provider executable or reconstruct a raw command. Frontmatter `tier` is a routing recommendation, never a coordinator request field. For a review, cross-check, tiebreaker, or fallback over an authored artifact, capture its exact UTF-8 content and observed author model in the optional `artifact` object even when governance is false; never paste it into the prompt as a provenance substitute. # Simulate-user — in-character persona reaction to an artifact Unlike `second-opinion` or `code-review`, this skill is not an analytical critique. It is a **strict in-character roleplay**: the verifier becomes a specific persona reading the artifact and reacts as that persona would — confused, impatient, suspicious, enthusiastic, missing the ask, snagging on a phrase — without breaking character to deliver a "review." The point is to see how the artifact lands with the intended audience, not how