logic-checklisted

Audit a verifiable, step-wise computation (arithmetic, financial calculation, algorithm trace, constraint solve, scheduling problem) by having the reviewer independently re-derive the answer from the original problem statement and comparing — not by asking the reviewer to "check the work," which anchors on the existing derivation. Use when the user says "audit this calculation," "double-check my math with the reviewer," "verify these computations," "check this trace," "is this cap table right," "re-derive this with the reviewer," "audit my arithmetic," "logic-check this," or "is this number right." Also offer this proactively when the active primary has just performed a long multi-step calculation, an algorithmic trace (DP table, graph traversal, constraint propagation), a financial computation (cap table, tax math, unit conversion, currency-adjusted aggregate), or any computation where a wrong intermediate state silently corrupts the final answer.
sumitake/agent-collab · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 65

Install: claude install-skill sumitake/agent-collab

## Unified runtime invocation Resolve the **plugin root** from this loaded file: `SKILL.md` is at `<plugin-root>/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md`. Invoke only `python3 "<plugin-root>/coordinator.py"` and send one bounded JSON request on stdin. Before constructing it, read the **Coordinator request schema** in `<plugin-root>/README.md`; never invent fields or route/action pairs. The public coordinator re-observes the active host/model, captures artifact provenance, excludes same-family routes, and verifies the co-packaged native manifest. It runs standalone from the installed plugin. Never discover a provider executable or reconstruct a raw command. Frontmatter `tier` is a routing recommendation, never a coordinator request field. For a review, cross-check, tiebreaker, or fallback over an authored artifact, capture its exact UTF-8 content and observed author model in the optional `artifact` object even when governance is false; never paste it into the prompt as a provenance substitute. # Logic check — independent re-derivation of a verifiable computation Some tasks have a definite right answer reachable through mechanical steps where each step locks in state for the next. **A logic check catches the compounding-error class** that a free-form `second-opinion` review of the conclusion does not — because the conclusion looks plausible while a hidden intermediate step is wrong. The **mechanism is independent re-derivation**, not "review my reasoning." Asking a model to audit anot