brainstormlisted

Use the reviewer as a divergent-thinking partner to widen the option space on an open-ended problem — generate alternatives, surface unfamiliar angles, or pressure-test an idea against a different model's priors. Use when the user says "brainstorm with the reviewer," "let's ideate," "what are some options," "think this through with the reviewer," "thinking partner," "give me alternatives," or asks any "what could we do about X" type question with no single right answer. Also offer this proactively when the user is early in an open-ended task with no clear answer, when the active primary has already proposed one approach and a fresh divergent angle would help, when a list of options would serve better than a single recommendation, or when the user is visibly stuck in a single line of thinking and a different model's priors could break the rut.
sumitake/agent-collab · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 65

Install: claude install-skill sumitake/agent-collab

## Unified runtime invocation Resolve the **plugin root** from this loaded file: `SKILL.md` is at `<plugin-root>/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md`. Invoke only `python3 "<plugin-root>/coordinator.py"` and send one bounded JSON request on stdin. Before constructing it, read the **Coordinator request schema** in `<plugin-root>/README.md`; never invent fields or route/action pairs. The public coordinator re-observes the active host/model, captures artifact provenance, excludes same-family routes, and verifies the co-packaged native manifest. It runs standalone from the installed plugin. Never discover a provider executable or reconstruct a raw command. Frontmatter `tier` is a routing recommendation, never a coordinator request field. For a review, cross-check, tiebreaker, or fallback over an authored artifact, capture its exact UTF-8 content and observed author model in the optional `artifact` object even when governance is false; never paste it into the prompt as a provenance substitute. # Brainstorm — divergent ideation with the cross-family partner Brainstorming is for **widening the option space**, not narrowing it. Convergence and decisions happen after. The point of using the reviewer as the brainstorming partner is that the reviewer sits in a different model family from the active primary (independent vs. resolved) — so its priors, training corpora emphases, and default failure modes are different. Those differences are exactly what generates ideas the active primary would