← ClaudeAtlas

reviewlisted

Review, audit, sanity-check, look-at any review-able target. Triggers on a GitHub PR URL (fetched via the gh CLI), a local path or "." (review the working tree), a markdown/doc file, or a comment-thread URL. Read-only by default; --fix applies accepted findings locally and pushes to the PR branch after confirmation (never force, never merge, never to a protected branch). Produces severity-tiered findings (blocker / critical / should / may / nit) with path:line and <=15-word verbatim evidence quotes. Six dimensions: correctness, tests, security, performance, readability, consistency. For a deep PR review with cross-file code-context retrieval, use /adk:pr-review.
sujeet-pro/agents-devkit · ★ 0 · Code & Development · score 73
Install: claude install-skill sujeet-pro/agents-devkit
# review — review any target (lightweight) Polymorphic on the target. **Read-only by default.** Lightweight by design — no worktree, no embeddings. For a deep PR review with code-context retrieval and inline comment posting, use `/adk:pr-review`. The full operating contract lives in this skill folder — read these as you need them: | Aspect | File | |---|---| | How you review (voice, tiers, evidence rules) | `persona.md` | | The phased process + Workflow orchestration | `workflow.md` | | Hard rules + refusals + safety | `rules.md` | | Target routing (PR / local / doc / thread) | `dispatch.md` | ## Quick start 1. **Read `dispatch.md`** and classify the target. Resolve the diff: - **GitHub PR URL** → `gh pr view <url> --json …` for metadata, `gh pr diff <url>` for the diff. (GitHub access is always the `gh` CLI — assume the user ran `gh auth login`.) - **`.` or local path** → `git diff` against the merge-base of the current branch. - **doc / comment thread** → fetch the content directly. 2. **Read `persona.md`** — adopt the findings-first reviewer stance. 3. **Run the workflow in `workflow.md`.** For any non-trivial diff, fan the six dimensions out in parallel with the **Workflow tool** (one `code-reviewer` / `security-auditor` agent per dimension), then adversarially verify each finding before it survives. Small diffs (≤ ~150 LOC, single concern) may be reviewed inline without a workflow — but still one dimension at a time. 4. **Report** severity-tiered findings w