fastapi-review

Solid

Use when the user wants a thorough PR or branch review. Triages by diff size — small PRs get a single-pass review, large PRs fan out to parallel sub-agents (correctness, architecture, security, scope, and an Agentic & Evals lens that activates on AI/agent code) with a validation phase that drops false positives.

Code & Development 11 stars 0 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 79/100

Stars 20%
36
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

> **Adapted for Cline.** > > - This skill orchestrates parallel sub-agents using Claude's `Agent` tool / `subagent_type` syntax. Most coding agents now have their own parallel sub-agent or task mechanism (e.g. Cursor's `Task`, Codex's `spawn_agent`, Gemini subagents, Copilot's `task`) — use yours and translate the wording. If it truly has none, apply each lens or angle yourself, sequentially, and combine the findings. You are conducting a thorough PR review. Follow these phases in order. --- ## Phase 1: Context Gathering If `master` is missing or unset, default to `dev` if it exists, otherwise `main`. The diff stat, full diff, commit log, and branch name below are pre-rendered as dynamic context — you do not need to fetch them yourself. ### Diff stat Run `git diff --stat master...HEAD` and use its output. ### Commit log Run `git log master..HEAD --oneline` and use its output. ### Branch name Run `git branch --show-current` and use its output. ### What you still need to do 1. **Get the reviewable diff.** Run `klaussy review-prep --base master`. It returns the diff trimmed to reviewable files — lockfiles, generated/vendored trees, minified/binary blobs, and pure renames are dropped — followed by an **Excluded from review** manifest listing what it dropped and why. Use this trimmed diff as *the diff* for the rest of the review. If the `klaussy` CLI isn't on PATH (the command errors), fall back to `git diff master...HEAD` for the full untrimmed diff and proceed as be...

Details

Author
steph-dove
Repository
steph-dove/klaussy-agents
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Solid

code-review

Multi-agent code review with learning feedback loop — reviews PRs using parallel specialized agents (style, logic, security) with confidence scoring and false-positive reduction

48 Updated today
sliamh11
AI & Automation Solid

review

Dispatches parallel dimension agents across a diff, PR (URL or number), commit SHA, branch, staged changes, or patch file — covering security, correctness, api-compat, test-coverage, and perf-observability — synthesizes findings by severity, and emits a merge recommendation. Use when changes are ready for review before merge. Read-only: this skill analyzes and reports only — it never edits files, commits, pushes, comments on a PR, or modifies the PR description.

45 Updated today
griffinwork40
Code & Development Listed

pr-review

Project-aware PR review grounded in AGENTS.md conventions and vault memory. Runs a multi-dimension review: correctness, convention compliance, test quality, security, performance, and conditional checks (TDQS scoring, feature surface docs). Use when asked to "review this PR", "review PR #X", "do a thorough review", "review against AGENTS.md", or "review with my preferences in mind". Complements the built-in /code-review (which is generic) by loading project-specific conventions and personal preferences. NOT for: quick CI failure diagnosis (use pr-monitor), post-merge testing (use verify), or code simplification without a PR context (use code-quality).

0 Updated 6 days ago
aliasunder