← ClaudeAtlas

shipkit-review-planninglisted

Internal reviewer — assesses planning artifact alignment. Checks definitions agree, specs cover roadmap, no gaps. Dispatched by orch-planning, not for direct use.
stefan-stepzero/shipkit · ★ 1 · Code & Development · score 78
Install: claude install-skill stefan-stepzero/shipkit
# shipkit-review-planning - Planning Assessment **Purpose**: Read all planning artifacts and cross-reference them for alignment. Write a structured assessment for the planning orchestrator. ## Input **Required artifacts** (the planning loop must produce all of these): - `.shipkit/stack.json` - `.shipkit/codebase-index.json` - `.shipkit/spec-roadmap.json` - `.shipkit/specs/*.json` — at least one spec per roadmap item - `.shipkit/plans/*.json` — at least one plan per spec - `.shipkit/test-cases/` — test specifications - `.shipkit/user-tasks.json` — manual user tasks **Direction context** (produced by prior loop, read for cross-reference): - `.shipkit/why.json` - `.shipkit/product-definition.json`, `.shipkit/engineering-definition.json` - `.shipkit/architecture.json` - `.shipkit/goals/strategic.json`, `.shipkit/goals/product.json`, `.shipkit/goals/engineering.json` ## Alignment Checks 1. **Completeness**: Are ALL required planning artifacts present? Missing artifacts are gaps. 2. **Product ↔ Engineering**: Every product feature has a corresponding mechanism? 3. **Definition ↔ Specs**: Every defined feature has a spec? 4. **Specs ↔ Roadmap**: Roadmap includes all specs with sensible priority? 5. **Plans ↔ Specs**: Every spec has a plan? Plans reference the correct spec? 6. **Stage alignment**: Specs and plans scoped for current stage? 7. **Goal coverage**: Specs, if implemented, satisfy product and engineering goals? 8. **Architecture consistency**: Do plans align with arch