feedback-rejection-flow

Solid

First-officer feedback-rejection routing — the correction-round record, reuse-or-fresh routing of findings to the `feedback-to` target, the reviewer re-run, gate re-entry. Invoke at the rejection-handling point when a feedback gate recommends REJECTED or the captain rejects at a feedback-to stage.

AI & Automation 65 stars 6 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 80/100

Stars 20%
61
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Feedback Rejection Flow This skill loads at the rejection-handling point; the rejection DETECTION, the `### Feedback Cycles` write-scope rules, the reuse conditions, and the budget probe stay always-on in the FO contract, and this procedure references them by name. ## Feedback Rejection Flow When a feedback stage recommends REJECTED: 1. Read the rejected stage's `feedback-to` target — the stage that receives the fix request, not the reviewer. 2. Append this round's entry to `### Feedback Cycles` in the entity body, in the format below. 3. Read the deviation and the AC-drift note from the two most recent entries. Past the declared tolerance — 2× unless the entity declares its own — or on a narrowed AC, record a design-reset decision (reconfirm, re-scope, park, or escalate) before any further round; no automatic re-dispatch while that decision is absent. On cycle 3, escalate to the human instead of another round. 4. Invoke `«context-budget»()`. If the old ensign is over budget or the source is unavailable, shut down and fresh-dispatch; if no probe is declared, proceed to reuse below. 5. Route findings back to the target stage in the same worktree using `«addressable-worker»` when the existing handle is addressable and reuse conditions pass; otherwise shut down and fresh-dispatch. The routed message must carry the concrete next-stage assignment and fix work, not just an acknowledgment request. Do not treat the immediate routing response as the new completion result: if the...

Details

Author
spacedock-dev
Repository
spacedock-dev/spacedock
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Go
License
Apache-2.0

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Listed

feedback

Use when receiving feedback on your work — review findings, user corrections, audit results, external reviewer notes — to triage by authority, adjudicate each point on evidence, integrate without regressions, and close the loop with the source. Evidence flips positions; assertions don't.

1 Updated today
davidlee
AI & Automation Listed

feedback-resolution

Address PR review feedback through surgical fixes traceable to specific comments, apply the Boy Scout Rule only to already-modified files (separate `improve:` commits), recover context by code snippet rather than line number, and enforce pushback only when factually incorrect, test-breaking, or CLAUDE.md-violating. Use when resolving reviewer comments on a pull request. This skill MUST be consulted because every untraceable change is out-of-context, and pushback without evidence is just disagreement.

6 Updated today
synaptiai
AI & Automation Listed

requirements-feedback

This skill should be used when the user asks about "feedback loops", "iterate on requirements", "continuous documentation", "refine requirements", "update requirements", "requirements changed", "stakeholder review", "validate requirements", "incorporate feedback", "gather feedback", "requirements review meeting", "backlog refinement feedback", "user research findings", "sprint retrospective feedback", "help me gather feedback", "run a feedback session", "get input on my vision", "get input on my epics", "get input on my stories", "collect user feedback", "document feedback from meeting", "review requirements with stakeholders", or when they need guidance on collecting and incorporating feedback throughout the requirements lifecycle.

3 Updated today
mamiaijf