council

Featured

4-perspective decision evaluation for architecture choices. Triggers: council, evaluate decision, pros cons, multi-angle, alternatives.

AI & Automation 161 stars 21 forks Updated yesterday Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 93/100

Stars 20%
74
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Decision Council $ARGUMENTS Evaluate a decision from 4 distinct perspectives using parallel sub-agents, then synthesize a weighted recommendation. ## Usage ``` /council [decision question or proposal to evaluate] ``` ## What This Command Does 1. **Parses** the decision question from user input 2. **Gathers** codebase context relevant to the decision 3. **Spawns** 4 parallel sub-agents — each analyzing from a different perspective 4. **Synthesizes** all perspectives into a structured recommendation with decision matrix ## MANDATORY: You MUST use the Agent tool **DO NOT analyze the decision yourself.** Your job is to parse the question, spawn 4 sub-agents in parallel via the `Agent` tool, and synthesize their outputs. If you attempt to provide all perspectives inline, you have failed. ## Process ### 1. Parse the Decision Extract from the user's input: - **The proposal** — what is being considered - **The alternatives** — what the options are (if not stated, infer the implicit alternative: status quo) - **The context** — what project/codebase/situation this applies to If the question is too vague to evaluate, ask ONE clarifying question before proceeding. ### 2. Gather Context Before spawning agents, quickly scan the codebase for relevant context: - Current tech stack, dependencies, patterns in use - Existing code related to the decision area - Configuration, infrastructure, or architectural choices already made Include this context in each sub-agent prompt so...

Details

Author
softspark
Repository
softspark/ai-toolkit
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

council

Pressure-tests high-stakes engineering decisions through 5 advisors with distinct thinking styles — independent analysis, anonymous peer review, chairman synthesis. Use when the user says "council this", "run the council", "pressure-test", "stress-test", "red team this", or "devil's advocate" on a real engineering trade-off. Distinct from strategic-analysis — adds adversarial peer review for decisions where the user suspects their first instinct is biased.

0 Updated today
emrecdr
AI & Automation Solid

konsilium

Council — 5 independent AI perspectives + mutual critique + synthesis (adapted from karpathy/llm-council for Claude Code). For high-stakes decisions where the answer does NOT follow unambiguously from the data — go/no-go before real consequences, critiquing a methodology, choosing between competing approaches, pressure-testing a conclusion you're attached to, designing risk controls. NOT for log/data analysis (the council has no data access) and not for factual lookups. Triggers — "convene the council", "run it past the council", "go/no-go", "pressure-test this".

14 Updated 3 days ago
Sanexxxx777
AI & Automation Solid

ask-the-council

Convenes a panel of opinionated advisors (parallel Claude subagents, each with a distinct mandate and a forbidden move so they genuinely diverge), then a Chairman synthesis that COMMITS to one recommendation with explicit tradeoffs. Use proactively for any high-stakes design, architecture, or tradeoff decision where credible options genuinely compete. Also on "ask the council", "the council", "get a panel". Not for fact-finding or decisions with one obvious answer — answer those directly.

6 Updated 3 days ago
alonbaron