council
Solid4-perspective decision evaluation for architecture choices. Triggers: council, evaluate decision, pros cons, multi-angle, alternatives.
AI & Automation 155 stars
19 forks Updated 2 days ago MIT
Install
Quality Score: 93/100
Stars 20%
Recency 20%
Frontmatter 20%
Documentation 15%
Issue Health 10%
License 10%
Description 5%
Skill Content
# Decision Council
$ARGUMENTS
Evaluate a decision from 4 distinct perspectives using parallel sub-agents, then synthesize a weighted recommendation.
## Usage
```
/council [decision question or proposal to evaluate]
```
## What This Command Does
1. **Parses** the decision question from user input
2. **Gathers** codebase context relevant to the decision
3. **Spawns** 4 parallel sub-agents — each analyzing from a different perspective
4. **Synthesizes** all perspectives into a structured recommendation with decision matrix
## MANDATORY: You MUST use the Agent tool
**DO NOT analyze the decision yourself.** Your job is to parse the question, spawn 4 sub-agents in parallel via the `Agent` tool, and synthesize their outputs. If you attempt to provide all perspectives inline, you have failed.
## Process
### 1. Parse the Decision
Extract from the user's input:
- **The proposal** — what is being considered
- **The alternatives** — what the options are (if not stated, infer the implicit alternative: status quo)
- **The context** — what project/codebase/situation this applies to
If the question is too vague to evaluate, ask ONE clarifying question before proceeding.
### 2. Gather Context
Before spawning agents, quickly scan the codebase for relevant context:
- Current tech stack, dependencies, patterns in use
- Existing code related to the decision area
- Configuration, infrastructure, or architectural choices already made
Include this context in each sub-agent prompt so...
Details
- Author
- softspark
- Repository
- softspark/ai-toolkit
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- 2 days ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
AI & Automation Listed
council
4-voice parallel deliberation (Architect · Skeptic · Pragmatist · Critic) for architecture, tech selection, or design decisions with no clear answer. Anti-anchoring: each voice gets independent context. Records decision in harness-mem.
8 Updated today
epicsagas AI & Automation Solid
council
Convene real AI agents for multi-perspective deliberation on architecture, design, and strategy decisions.
324 Updated today
automagik-dev AI & Automation Solid
council
Convene a four-voice council for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls. Use when multiple valid paths exist and you need structured disagreement before choosing.
213,908 Updated today
affaan-m