paperlisted

> **Normative authority:** `docs/SCIPAPER_STANDARD.md`. > This skill supplies concrete scientific-writing guidance and canonical L0 > examples. It does not define an independent paper verdict. If this file, a > style profile, or a workflow conflicts with the unified standard, the unified > standard wins. Project-specific anchors remain marked `[WGL]`. ## Paper Writing Standards / 论文写作标准 Target: **Top-tier astrophysics journals** (ApJ, MNRAS, A&A level). ### General Principles - **Accuracy over elegance.** Never sacrifice precision for readability. Every claim must be verifiable. - **Quantitative over qualitative.** Replace vague descriptions with numbers. Not "significantly improved" but "AUC increased from 0.834 to 0.927 (+11.1%)". - **Reproducibility.** The Methods section must contain enough detail for an independent researcher to reproduce all results. All hyperparameters, data splits, and evaluation protocols must be specified. ### Structure and Narrative A motivation → method → validation arc is a useful default for many empirical papers, not a universal document template. Theory papers, methods papers, data releases, and multi-contribution papers may require a different shape. In every case, make the contribution graph explicit: explain how the claims relate, place definitions before use, and ensure that each conclusion is supported by the presented argument or evidence. When the three-part arc fits: 1. **Motivation**: identify the scientific problem, prior lim