test-quality-analysis
SolidDetect test smells, overmocking, flaky tests, and coverage issues. Analyze test effectiveness, maintainability, and reliability. Use when reviewing tests or improving test quality.
Install
Quality Score: 88/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- secondsky
- Repository
- secondsky/claude-skills
- Created
- 6 months ago
- Last Updated
- 2 weeks ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
testing-anti-patterns
Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or unreliable test failures, or when the user mentions flaky tests, test smells, brittle tests, test isolation issues, mock overuse, slow tests, or test maintenance problems.
analyzing-test-quality
Automatically activated when user asks about test quality, code coverage, test reliability, test maintainability, or wants to analyze their test suite. Provides framework-agnostic test quality analysis and improvement recommendations. Does NOT provide framework-specific patterns - use jest-testing or playwright-testing for those.
test-anti-patterns
Quick pragmatic review of .NET test code for anti-patterns that undermine reliability and diagnostic value. Use when asked to review tests, find test problems, check test quality, or audit tests for common mistakes. Catches assertion gaps, flakiness indicators, over-mocking, naming issues, and structural problems with actionable fixes. Use for periodic test code reviews and PR feedback. For a deep formal audit based on academic test smell taxonomy, use exp-test-smell-detection instead. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit.
exp-test-smell-detection
Deep formal test smell audit based on academic research taxonomy (testsmells.org). Detects 19 categorized smell types — conditional logic, mystery guests, sensitive equality, eager tests, and more — with calibrated severity and research-backed remediation. Use for comprehensive test suite health assessments. For a quick pragmatic review, use test-anti-patterns instead. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), evaluating assertion quality specifically (use exp-assertion-quality), or finding test duplication and boilerplate (use exp-test-maintainability).
testing
Use when writing, reviewing, or improving tests, deciding what to mock, or designing interfaces for testability.