multi-ai-consultant

Solid

Consult external AIs (Gemini 2.5 Pro, OpenAI Codex, Claude) for second opinions. Use for debugging failures, architectural decisions, security validation, or need fresh perspective with synthesis.

AI & Automation 162 stars 25 forks Updated 2 weeks ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 91/100

Stars 20%
74
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Multi-AI Consultant Consult external AIs for second opinions when Claude Code is stuck or making critical decisions. --- ## What This Skill Does This skill enables **future Claude Code sessions** to consult other AIs when: - Stuck on a bug after one failed attempt - Making architectural decisions - Security concerns need validation - Fresh perspective needed **Key innovation**: Uses existing CLI tools (`gemini`, `codex`) instead of building MCP servers - much simpler and more maintainable. --- ## When to Use This Skill ### Automatic Triggers (No User Action Needed) Claude Code should **automatically suggest** using this skill when: 1. **After 1 failed debugging attempt** - Tried one approach to fix a bug - Still not working or different error - → Suggest: "Should I consult [Gemini|Fresh Claude] for a second opinion?" 2. **Before architectural decisions** - Significant design choices (state management, routing, data flow) - Framework selection - Database schema design - → Auto-consult (mention to user): "Consulting Gemini for architectural validation..." 3. **Security changes** - Authentication logic - Authorization rules - Cryptography - Input validation - → Auto-consult: "Consulting Gemini to verify security approach..." 4. **When uncertain** - Multiple valid approaches - Trade-offs not clear - Conflicting advice in documentation - → Suggest: "Would you like me to consult another AI for additional perspective?" ...

Details

Author
secondsky
Repository
secondsky/claude-skills
Created
6 months ago
Last Updated
2 weeks ago
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

agents-consilium

Query external AI agents (Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, Claude Code headless) in parallel for independent second opinions, code review, bug investigation, and consensus on high-stakes decisions. Agents and models are configurable in config.json. Use for architecture choices, security review, or ambiguous problems where independent perspectives matter. Not for simple questions answerable from docs or the codebase — use web search or repo exploration instead.

77 Updated 6 days ago
CodeAlive-AI
AI & Automation Listed

gemini-chat-and-reason

Get a second opinion from Gemini via text generation or multi-turn chat. Use for code review, design critique, sanity-checking before commit, or when Claude wants another perspective on a complex decision.

0 Updated 3 days ago
azmym
AI & Automation Listed

claude-consult

Consult Claude specialist agents during implementation for codebase understanding, pattern checking, security review, debugging help, and more. Use this skill whenever you're unsure about conventions, stuck on a failure, or need expert input before writing code. Does not replace the formal review gates in agent-loops — this is for mid-implementation consultation.

15 Updated 2 days ago
NickCrew
AI & Automation Solid

consult-codex

Compare OpenAI Codex GPT-5.5 and code-searcher responses for comprehensive dual-AI code analysis. Use when you need multiple AI perspectives on code questions.

2,379 Updated today
centminmod
AI & Automation Listed

dont-ask-me

Get a second opinion from a different model family when the user wants to validate or stress-test Claude's answer before trusting it. The skill is user-triggered (not automatic) — Claude activates it when the user signals uncertainty or explicitly asks for a cross-check. Use when the user says any of these (or semantically similar): SECOND-OPINION TRIGGERS — 'second opinion', 'give me a second opinion', 'sanity check', 'sanity check this', 'cross-check', 'cross-check this', 'am I missing something', 'stress-test this', 'review this', 'critique this', 'devil's advocate', 'thoughts?', 'is this right?', 'poke holes in this', 'what could go wrong', 'another perspective please'. FULL-REVIEW TRIGGERS — 'this is important', 'run a full review', 'big decision', 'high-stakes', 'high-stakes review', 'check before I send', 'before publishing', 'boardroom debate', 'dual validation', 'two independent opinions', 'don't let me ship something dumb', 'this can't be wrong', 'double-check this'. ROUND-TABLE TRIGGERS — 'help me

3 Updated 5 days ago
awrshift