← ClaudeAtlas

paper-review-lite-codexlisted

Run a cross-model adversarial pre-submission audit from Codex. Use when a user explicitly requests the heavier paper-review-lite-codex workflow, independent Codex and Claude review passes, or cross-model verification of a manuscript. Apply the paper-review-lite protocol, cross-check findings against the manuscript, and retain only evidence-grounded issues.
scdenney/open-science-skills · ★ 53 · AI & Automation · score 74
Install: claude install-skill scdenney/open-science-skills
# Paper review lite: Codex lead, cross-model audit Run Codex as the lead and use Claude Code's non-interactive CLI as the independent model family. This is the Codex-side equivalent of the Claude skill with the same name; the direction of delegation is reversed. Read [`../paper-review-lite/SKILL.md`](../paper-review-lite/SKILL.md) completely before starting. It defines the review dimensions, severity rubric, evidence requirements, and final report format. If the sibling skill is unavailable, stop and tell the user to install it; do not reconstruct a partial protocol from memory. ## Sandbox constraint — read before the first `claude -p` call `claude -p` is a different binary than `codex exec`, so it does not hit the in-process IPC failure that breaks nested `codex exec` calls under sandbox. But under `workspace-write` sandbox, an outbound `claude -p` network call was observed (July 2026) to hang rather than complete or fail cleanly — Codex's sandbox restricts network access, and `claude -p` needs it to reach Anthropic's API. That observation is less rigorously isolated than the nested-`codex exec` failure (no distinct error message, just an unresponsive process that had to be killed), so treat it as a strong warning rather than a certainty. If a `claude -p` call hangs rather than returning, do not assume it will eventually resolve — request escalation (`sandbox_permissions: require_escalated`) for that call, or run from an unsandboxed session, before retrying. ## Prefligh