presentation-story-grilllisted

# Grill the story Use when `story-grill` is the current gate. - Read repo instructions, `PRESENTATION-BRIEF.md`, `EVIDENCE-LEDGER.md`, `STORY.md`, `STORYBOARD.md`, and cited source files before judging the story. - Always explore the files instead of asking the user for discoverable facts. - Use an interactive question path when a live consequential decision still needs human judgment. - Ask one question at a time when a consequential story decision is unresolved. - Include a recommended answer with each question. - Use `references/opposition-review.md` for the autonomous opposition-review fallback when the user is unavailable or the remaining challenge is clear from the files. - State the strongest reasonable case against the story and what the opposition must concede. - Pressure-test why the audience should care, whether the thesis answers the right problem, whether the evidence supports the interpretation, what counter-evidence is missing, whether slides repeat or decorate, and whether the conclusion really follows. - Return `needs_revision: product-grill` when the story exposes the wrong audience, problem, outcome, promise, or success test. - Return `needs_revision: evidence` when the story needs unsupported claims, missing counter-evidence, or weaker wording. - Return `passed` only when the remaining story is still useful, accurate, and distinctive after the strongest reasonable opposition. Write only consequential decisions to `GRILL-LOG.md` from `../presentation-pro