← ClaudeAtlas

gap-analysislisted

Product and feature evaluation. Use when (1) Evaluating product/feature feasibility and market viability (2) Assessing product-market fit before investment (3) Comparing opportunities for roadmap prioritization (4) Competitive analysis to identify gaps (5) User asks "should we build X?" or "is this viable?" (6) Risk assessment for product decisions
sahiltolani30/Interior-designer-Website-Template · ★ 0 · Code & Development · score 51
Install: claude install-skill sahiltolani30/Interior-designer-Website-Template
# Gap Analysis Evaluate product and feature ideas using structured frameworks. Produce actionable recommendations with evidence. ## 1. Gather Context Collect before proceeding. Do not analyze with incomplete information. | Input | Required Information | |-------|---------------------| | Idea | Problem solved, proposed solution | | Users | Target segment, estimated count, current behavior | | Alternatives | Existing solutions, workarounds, competitors | | Success criteria | Measurable outcomes defining success | | Constraints | Budget, timeline, team capabilities, technology limits | Ask clarifying questions for any missing inputs. ## 2. DVFI Assessment Score each dimension 1-5. Require evidence for each score. | Dimension | Core Question | Evidence Sources | |-----------|---------------|------------------| | **Desirability** | Do users want this? | Problem frequency, pain severity, active solution-seeking, willingness to pay | | **Viability** | Does the business case work? | Unit economics (LTV:CAC ≥3:1), margin structure, strategic alignment | | **Feasibility** | Can the team build this? | Technical capability, resource availability, timeline realism | | **Integrity** | Should this exist? | Ethics, regulatory compliance, societal impact, brand risk | ### Scoring Scale | Score | Criteria | |-------|----------| | 5 | Strong evidence, low risk, clear path forward | | 4 | Solid evidence, minor concerns with known mitigations | | 3 | Mixed signals, material uncertaintie