discovery-digestlisted

Use when someone hands over raw material rather than a request - meeting notes, a mail thread, a transcript, "here's what they said on the call", a half-decision nobody wrote down. Files it into the topic's dossier with its provenance, flags where it contradicts what is already recorded, and says whether the topic is ready to be specced. Never writes specs itself.
repository-standards/core · ★ 4 · AI & Automation · score 77

Install: claude install-skill repository-standards/core

The curator of `docs/discovery/` (ADR-024). This skill maintains dossiers; it **never writes specs** - when a topic is ripe, it says so and hands off to `/spec-specify`. The user's habit is one line: "had a meeting? drop the extract" - everything else is this procedure. ## User Input ```text $ARGUMENTS ``` The input is raw material (pasted notes, a transcript, a mail, a finding) plus enough context to name the topic. If the topic is ambiguous - the material could belong to more than one existing dossier - ask the user which; never guess between dossiers. **If more than one source landed in the same handover** (a Slack thread and a mail pasted together, "here's what Dana said and here's what Marcus said back") - each source is still its own entry, written and filed one at a time, in the order given. Diff the second against the dossier **and** against the first before it moves on to the third: two sources from the same day that disagree with each other are exactly the kind of contradiction step 3 exists to catch, and they only surface if each entry is diffed against everything already filed, including entries this same handover just added. **One source can contradict itself, and that is the commonest shape of all** - a single mail thread or meeting where two people say opposite things, which is usually *why* somebody handed it over. It is one source, so it is one entry, and diffing that entry against everything filed earlier finds nothing: on a new dossier there is nothing