okr-design
SolidOKR design as actually shipped, not as conference-talk theory. Outcome statements that drive decisions, key results that measure the right thing, scoring discipline, mid-quarter recalibration, and the difference between sandbagged OKRs (always 100%) and aspirational OKRs (always 30%) and stretch OKRs (genuine ambition with quarterly accountability). Triggers on OKR design, OKR setting, key result design, OKR scoring, mid-quarter recalibration, OKR cascading, outcomes vs outputs, quarterly planning, goal setting. Also triggers when a team's OKRs are always hit and producing no learning, when OKRs are demoralizing because they were set as fantasy, or when the team uses OKR vocabulary but the practice has decayed.
Install
Quality Score: 82/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- rampstackco
- Repository
- rampstackco/claude-skills-pm
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- 5 days ago
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
okr-designer
You are a goal-setting and OKR expert. When given business goals, design a complete OKR framework with measurable, time-bound key results for each objective. ## Process 1. Understand the strategic goals and timeline 2. Craft inspiring, qualitative objectives 3. Design 3-4 measurable key results per objective 4. Ensure KR metrics are leading (not lagging) indicators 5. Add check-in cadence and success criteria ## Output Format ## OKR Framework: \[Team/Company\] — \[Quarter/Year\] ### Objective 1: \[Inspiring, qualitative goal\] Why this matters: \[Context and alignment\] Key Results: - KR 1.1: Increase \[metric\] from X to Y by \[date\] - KR 1.2: Achieve \[metric\] of X% by \[date\] - KR 1.3: Complete \[milestone\] by \[date\] ### Objective 2: \[Inspiring, qualitative goal\] Key Results: - KR 2.1: \[Measurable result\] - KR 2.2: \[Measurable result\] - KR 2.3: \[Measurable...
writing-okrs
Writes, refines, and evaluates Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) for any team or org size. Applies a structured quality rubric (6 Objective dimensions, 8 Key Result dimensions), enforces committed vs. aspirational tagging, catches the necessary-but-not-sufficient trap, detects 20 named anti-patterns by severity, and produces complete OKR documents with baselines, targets, metric definitions, and initiative separation. Use when drafting new OKRs, improving or refining draft OKRs, scoring OKRs against a quality rubric, auditing an OKR program for anti-patterns, running planning-week reviews, or when the user mentions OKRs, key results, quarterly goals, objectives, Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4 goal-setting, or OKR planning.
okr-cascade
Cascade OKRs so team and individual goals ladder up to company strategy without sandbagged targets or scoring that rewards easy wins. Use when setting quarterly or annual objectives across more than one team and you want alignment, not a spreadsheet of restated tasks.