editorial-qa

Solid

Pre-publish QA framework for content. Brief adherence, voice consistency, fact accuracy, structure and clarity, AI-content audit, SEO and AEO compliance, internal linking and schema validation, QA at scale via sampling, the QA workflow, and the discipline that distinguishes catch-problems QA from checkbox QA. Triggers on editorial QA, content review, pre-publish review, content audit, content QA process, AI-content audit, hallucination check, content sampling, programmatic QA, voice consistency check, brief adherence check. Also triggers when a content team is shipping sloppy work, when AI-co-authored content is reaching publish unaudited, when a QA process burns reviewers out, or when a programmatic SEO set needs sampling discipline.

AI & Automation 287 stars 38 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 95/100

Stars 20%
82
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Editorial QA A senior editor's playbook for pre-publish content QA. The discipline that catches problems BEFORE content ships, not after. Most content QA is broken in one of two directions. The thin version is "did I read it once and is the spelling OK," which catches typos but misses brief drift, voice inconsistency, hallucinated facts, AI tells, and structural problems that reach readers as "this is fine but not memorable." The thick version is a 47-item checklist that nobody completes honestly because it is process theater: checkboxes nobody actually believes catch problems. This skill is the discipline of catch-problems QA. Each check earns its keep by catching a specific class of failure that would reach readers if missed. Checks that do not catch anything get cut. Checks the production volume cannot sustain get redesigned (sampling instead of full audit, automated instead of manual). The QA framework is what is left when you remove the theater. The skill covers three production shapes: single editorial pieces (one at a time, full QA), AI-generated drafts (with the AI-content audit that did not exist as prominently 2 years ago), and programmatic SEO sets at scale (sampling discipline, threshold gating). Each needs its own QA shape; the underlying methodology composes across all three. When to use this skill: building a content QA process from scratch, auditing an existing QA process that ships sloppy work or burns out the team, designing QA gates for an AI-assiste...

Details

Author
rampstackco
Repository
rampstackco/claude-skills
Created
1 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Testing & QA Listed

tester-quality

Validating content quality using AI-assisted QA and brand guideline compliance.

0 Updated 1 months ago
delta-and-beta
AI & Automation Listed

walter-agency-qc

Use for quality controlling content drafts inside an SEO agency. Runs AI detection, humanizes via Walter if needed, checks keyword preservation, and produces a QC summary with ready-to-publish recommendation.

4 Updated 5 days ago
walterwritesai
Testing & QA Listed

article-qa

Use to quality-check an article before it ships — an independent reviewer that scores CORE-EEAT, reconciles every fact against the evidence ledger, and returns a ship / no-ship verdict with a fix list. First-party QA gate for the article factory (P8); needs no external packs. 质检/审核/审稿/CORE-EEAT/EEAT/fact-check/事实核对/quality/质量评分/能不能发/ship判定/发布闸门

1 Updated yesterday
weitzu-com
AI & Automation Solid

ai-content-collaboration

How humans and AI compose in content workflows. Where AI legitimately participates, where humans must own, hybrid workflow patterns, voice ownership preservation, the AI slop problem, disclosure and transparency, team calibration, and the ethics of intellectually honest AI-assisted content production. Triggers on AI content workflow, AI-assisted writing, hybrid content production, AI in editorial, AI slop, AI disclosure, AI usage policy, AI content ethics, voice preservation with AI, team AI calibration. Also triggers when content feels generic despite quality tools, when team AI usage has drifted into inconsistency, or when a regulated or trust-sensitive context requires explicit AI policy.

287 Updated today
rampstackco
AI & Automation Solid

content-quality-auditor

Publish-readiness gate: 80-item CORE-EEAT audit with weighted scoring, veto checks, and fix plan. 内容质量/EEAT评分

1,941 Updated 2 weeks ago
aaron-he-zhu