← ClaudeAtlas

think-parallel-perspectives-reviewlisted

Evaluates a decision or idea through several deliberately separated lenses in turn (facts, upside, risks, intuition, alternatives, process) so that no single mode dominates, then synthesizes them into a balanced read, producing a multi-lens review. Use when a choice needs a rounded look, or when risk-aversion or optimism is drowning out the other perspectives.
product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skills · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 77
Install: claude install-skill product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skills
<!-- thinking-framework-skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skills | Apache-2.0 --> # Parallel Perspectives Review In ordinary review one mode dominates: a cautious voice or an optimist colors everything, and facts, feelings, and alternatives blur together. This skill separates them, examining the same decision through one lens at a time - facts and information, upside and value, cautions and risks, intuition and feelings, alternatives and creative angles, and the process or big-picture view - then synthesizing. Looking through the same lens at once ("parallel") gives the quiet modes airtime instead of letting the loudest dominate. The output is a **multi-lens review** ending in a synthesis. (This is the generic mechanism behind Six Thinking Hats, used descriptively; the branded framework's marketing claims are not relied on.) ## When to Use - A decision or idea needs a rounded, balanced look before committing. - Risk-aversion or optimism is dominating the discussion. - Quieter considerations (intuition, alternatives) keep getting skipped. ## When NOT to Use - A single lens is obviously all that matters; just use it. - For deep adversarial stress-testing of one thesis (use red team) or for failure causes (use premortem). - When the six lenses would be performed mechanically with only two or three carrying weight. - As consensus theater rather than genuine separation of modes. ## Instructions When asked for a parallel perspectives review, f