think-decision-option-reviewlisted

<!-- thinking-framework-skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skills | Apache-2.0 --> # Decision Option Review When several real options compete, intuition compares them on shifting, unstated criteria that nobody can inspect. This skill makes the comparison explicit: list the options, define and weight the criteria that actually matter, score each option, surface the tradeoffs, and recommend. The output is a **criteria-weighted option matrix**. It is a lightweight multi-criteria review, not academic MCDA, and it deliberately shows the tradeoffs rather than hiding behind a single total: weighted scores can manufacture false precision, so soft scores are flagged and the recommendation states what would flip it. ## When to Use - Choosing among several real, distinct options. - Objectives conflict and the tradeoffs are currently implicit. - The decision needs to be explained or defended to others. ## When NOT to Use - Trivial or obvious choices, or one-way doors needing deeper analysis than a matrix. - To generate options (use an ideation skill); this compares options that already exist. - When the criteria genuinely cannot be articulated. - As a way to make a single weighted total settle a close call (false precision). ## Instructions When asked to review options, follow these steps: 1. **List the options** being compared (the real, distinct ones). 2. **Define the criteria** that actually matter for this decision, and weight them (high / mediu