← ClaudeAtlas

crypto-ratinglisted

Rates a crypto asset on live data only and says whether to buy it and at what size — never from remembered prices, because in crypto a stale figure is wrong by a multiple rather than a little. Fetches and cross-checks the current price, market cap, supply and drawdown, screens new or thin tokens for rug and trap patterns before rating anything, does the dilution and unlock arithmetic, scores six dimensions, then turns the user's own capacity for loss into a maximum position size with the crash scenarios shown in money. Gives two separate verdicts, long-term hold and near-term entry, because they frequently disagree. Use whenever the user names a coin or token and asks whether to buy, sell, hold or avoid it, wants a crypto rating, analysis, second opinion or price view, asks how much of something to buy or how much to put in, mentions tokenomics, unlocks, FDV, altcoins, memecoins or whether a token is a scam, or asks about sizing and risk in their crypto portfolio.
prashant-cr/skills · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 75
Install: claude install-skill prashant-cr/skills
# Crypto rating Rates a digital asset on data fetched now, and converts that rating into a decision the specific person in front of you can act on — including, often, "not at any size". ## Two things make this different from rating a stock **There are no cash flows.** No earnings, no dividends, no book value, so discounted cash flow and price-to-earnings have nothing to operate on. What remains is genuinely different: how much the network is used and what it charges, how many tokens exist and how many are coming, who controls the supply, and whether the thing survives. Importing equity habits here produces analysis that sounds rigorous and measures nothing. **Your training data is actively dangerous here.** A stock's fundamentals drift slowly; a token's price can double or halve in a month, and every figure that matters is derived from it. A remembered price silently corrupts the market cap, the dilution maths, the drawdown, and the position size, while every number still looks plausible on the page. This is not hypothetical. Run the data script and read what it says about Bitcoin's drawdown from its high before assuming you know roughly where things stand. Analysts who "roughly remember" the market are wrong in this asset class in a way they are not wrong about a utility company. ## The one idea that organises everything below **The rating is not the decision. The position size is.** Drawdowns of 80% happen to the majors — not to the failures, to Bitcoin and Ethereum