debate
FeaturedHave the Claude and GPT partners critique each other's answers across a configurable number of rounds (default 1) before converging on a synthesis. Use when the user wants the two perspectives stress-tested against each other, not just shown side by side.
Install
Quality Score: 92/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- omnigent-ai
- Repository
- omnigent-ai/omnigent
- Created
- 1 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
council
Fan out a question to Claude and GPT-5.6-sol in parallel, run up to 3 rounds of adversarial debate where each model challenges the other's weakest argument and updates its position, assess convergence after each round with a dedicated subagent, then synthesize and deliver a final answer weighted by argument quality — not consensus.
deliberation
When and how to delegate to GPT, Gemini, Grok, and OpenRouter expert subagents via the deliberation MCP tools.
debate
Stage a structured multi-round adversarial debate between the active primary and the reviewer on a binary or near-binary proposition. Each side is assigned (or self-selects) an opposing position and defends it through openings, rebuttals, and an optional closing round; the agent then steps out of advocacy and synthesizes a verdict for the user. Use when the user says "debate this with the reviewer," "argue both sides," "steelman both positions," "play devil's advocate with the reviewer," "the active primary vs the reviewer on X," "have the reviewer argue the other side," or "make the case against." Also offer this proactively when the user is leaning hard one way on a high-stakes binary choice and a structured opposing case would stress-test the conviction better than a polite second opinion would.