reading-reviewlisted

Office-hours skill that runs one tradition-reading curriculum chunk's demonstration — the author demonstrates understanding of the tradition and its application to the deferral against the primary text, the graph is amended where the reading contradicts it or ratified where it holds — or, for a candidate chunk with no record yet, the session resolves to a new tradition record, grounding marks, or a dismissal clarification; it also mints and runs per-record context capstones (selection-bias audit, deferred amend/ratify, intent-evolution review) — and the chunk or capstone node is resolved (phase → done), which triggers /sync-reader's retirement of the chunk's excerpt from the e-reader. Interactive and unbounded; the inverse of /align-tactics' autonomy contract. Never files a GitHub issue.
natb1/commons.systems · ★ 3 · Code & Development · score 69

Install: claude install-skill natb1/commons.systems

# Reading Review `/reading-review [chunk-node-id]` runs one office-hours sitting of the tradition-reading curriculum (`tactic-tradition-reading-program` subtree). It is the recovery loop of `delegation-philosophical-articulation` functioning: the tradition articulations under review were made on Claude's account of the primary texts, so the author demonstrates understanding directly against the text, the graph is revised where the reading contradicts it, and the chunk node is resolved. Resolution (`phase: done`) is the trigger `/sync-reader` (`tactic-sync-reader-skill`) keys excerpt retirement on. This skill is **interactive** — the inverse of `/align-tactics`' autonomy contract. Its value is the dialectic; a rushed session is a permanent gap in the author's knowledge map, not a draft someone else catches. It instruments `strategy-philosophical-grounding`'s success-signal sensor ("owner review at office-hours"): every completed chunk produces a recorded round that moves a node (amend) or flips trust to verification (ratify). ## Periagoge — the design principle Education is the art of turning, not of putting sight into eyes (*Republic* 518b–d, verified chunk 1; 2026-07-08 clarification on `strategy-philosophical-grounding`). This skill turns the author toward the text; it never implants Claude's account of the reading — an interview that implants the account is the same capture the recovery loop exists to unwind. Concretely: - Probes cite the text, never Claude's gloss. -