keel-pilot

Solid

Staged bulk-run gate — before any mass-output job (labeling, generation, migration) enforce, in order, declare thresholds → smoke sample → gold-set validation → progressive ramp with halt conditions → acceptance sample. No full run on an unvalidated pipeline.

AI & Automation 8 stars 0 forks Updated 2 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 78/100

Stars 20%
32
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /keel-pilot — never run a big batch blind Use when a task will produce **many outputs whose quality cannot be eyeballed one by one** — mass labeling/classification, bulk generation, large migrations/transforms (heuristic: >100 items, or any unattended run). The failure this kills: pipelines verified "sometimes, by mood" — quality problems discovered after 5,000 items, or never. The sequence below is the published norm, not an invention (Anthropic best-practices fan-out, Pangakis et al. 2023, SRE canarying, Write-Audit-Publish); evidence trail with sources: `research/*/findings.md` (2026-07-16). Five gates, in order. **A gate must PASS before the next opens** — report each as pass/fail. ## Gate 0 — DECLARE (before anything runs) Write into the task (`TASKS.md done-when:` or a short pilot plan next to the runner): - **acceptance metrics** — e.g. per-class precision/recall vs a gold set; schema-validity %; - **halt thresholds** for the full run — e.g. >5% schema-invalid, or error rate >2× the pilot's, in any rolling 100-item window → HALT; - **sample plan** — smoke size (10–50) · gold set (250+ human-labeled items when label quality is load-bearing; smaller only with the user's explicit OK) · honeypot rate (5–10%) · acceptance sample by the rule of three (0 errors in 60 ⇒ <5% true error rate, in 300 ⇒ <1%, at 95%). Thresholds chosen AFTER seeing outputs are not thresholds. Defaults above are the literature's — adjust per project, with the user. ## Gate 1 — SMOKE (10–...

Details

Author
muratsilahtaroglu
Repository
muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit
Created
2 weeks ago
Last Updated
2 days ago
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

keel-autopilot

Gated autonomy for one session — advance phases back-to-back with the full /keel-phase-review run at every gate, auto-commit at phase ends, batch pushes for ONE approval. Stops on gate FAIL, UNCERTAIN decisions, architecture surprises, or security-adjacent changes. Push is never automatic.

8 Updated 2 days ago
muratsilahtaroglu
AI & Automation Listed

ground-truth-gates

Build executable verification gates (golden set, replay corpus, project checks) so "it works" becomes a checked fact instead of a claim. Load when changing any LLM-judgment step (classify/extract/route/prompt), refactoring logic that processes real logged data, designing tests for a fix, setting up a commit/ship gate for a project, designing a runtime guard (a hook, validator, or auth check) and its fail direction, or when you are about to trust a passing test that has never been shown able to fail. Also the reference for what "proof gate" means in delegation-and-review packets. Do NOT load for one-off scripts or exploratory spikes — plain operational-rigor covers those.

2 Updated today
F-e-u-e-r
AI & Automation Listed

regression-gatekeeper

Iterate-stage skill: gates any prompt or model change behind a golden-set regression run — the run happens and its results are shown before any ship verdict exists. Use when a change wants to ship — 'we tweaked the prompt, safe to ship?', 'regression plan before the model swap', 'gate this change', 'what has to run before this goes out' — or when /pm routes such a request here. Do NOT use to decide whether an upgrade is worth pursuing (model-upgrade-evaluator), to build the golden set (golden-dataset-builder), for post-incident capture (failure-to-eval-capture), or for regression-testing definitions.

1 Updated 5 days ago
Abhillashjadhav