keel-phase-review

Solid

End-of-phase gate — verify working product, tests, docs, ADRs, and handover before committing a phase.

Code & Development 8 stars 0 forks Updated 2 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 78/100

Stars 20%
32
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /keel-phase-review — end-of-phase checkpoint Run at the end of a phase (rules.md §2). Report the checklist with pass/fail; fix gaps before proposing a commit. Checklist: - [ ] **Working product** — the phase's feature runs; include a one-line "how to test this" **for the user**. What only a human can verify (browser/UX, prod host, real creds) is handed off as a recipe and tracked in HANDOVER (d) — never silently assumed passed. - [ ] **Tests** — relevant unit/integration (e2e if needed) written and run via `make test` (auto-log → `reports/tests/<date>/`); the phase's **committed summary** written to `reports/tests/<date>-phase<N>.md` (suites, counts, what was verified, and **measured durations**: suite runtime + the gate's key step timings — WHAT to time is project-specific (E2E latency, first token, query ms, batch throughput, …) — side-by-side with the previous phase's numbers so slowdowns surface at the gate, not in production); new test/fixture files one-lined in their folder README; one-line summary in HANDOVER.md (rules.md §2.8); bulk outputs passed the `/keel-pilot` gates where applicable. Ad-hoc reports (speed tests, golden proofs) complement `reports/tests/<date>-phase<N>.md` — never replace it. - [ ] **Architecture** — every structural change recorded in `docs/architecture.md`: new/changed module rows AND the component overview resynced with them (the module table is the source of truth — a stale top diagram fails this item, same contract a...

Details

Author
muratsilahtaroglu
Repository
muratsilahtaroglu/claude-code-starter-kit
Created
2 weeks ago
Last Updated
2 days ago
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Listed

pm-review

PM gate (Phase 2-PM) — an isolated product-manager review of task_plan.md against product_brief.md before any code. Verifies journey and criteria traceability, edge-case coverage, decision rationale, risk handling, and scope. Emits pm-review.json; APPROVE required to proceed to Phase 3/4.

0 Updated 5 days ago
createusernam
AI & Automation Solid

keel-plan

Create or revise PLAN.md — propose the phase DAG (phases · gates · dependencies) from the user's goal, get approval, write the table and regenerate the colored Mermaid diagram from it. Statuses flip at rituals (/keel-handover, /keel-phase-review); post-completion fixes land in the Fix log.

8 Updated 2 days ago
muratsilahtaroglu
API & Backend Listed

review-checklist

Review a PostgreSQL patch using the wiki's seven-phase checklist — covers Phase 0 reviewer-reflex gates + REJECT-A/B/C grade rubric for design rejections, plus the wiki's Phases 1-7 (apply/build, regress + check-world, pgindent, design fit, docs, comments, committer-readiness). Applies to reviewing someone else's pgsql-hackers / CommitFest submission OR self-reviewing your own patch before mailing it. Use whenever the user says "review this patch", "is it ready to send to hackers", "CF entry NNNN review", "pre-submission review", "REJECT this patch", or pastes a pgsql-hackers thread asking for a structured review. Skip for generic GitHub PR code review (app code), Terraform / Helm chart review, Python / Ruby / Rust / Go application code review, security audit (use security-review), API design review on REST / GraphQL endpoints, and documentation-only review for non-PG projects.

0 Updated 4 days ago
matejformanek