← ClaudeAtlas

writing-persuasive-documentslisted

Writes and reviews persuasive professional documents — reports, proposals, memos, briefs, articles, and recommendations — using reader-centered principles: value-first openings, problem framing, tension language, cost of inaction, argument over explanation, and evidence building. Produces documents that change what readers think rather than showing what the writer knows. Use when drafting proposals, executive summaries, recommendations, business cases, or position papers, when reviewing or improving drafts for persuasiveness and impact, when restructuring a document to lead with the problem and stakes, or when the user mentions persuasive writing, making a case, or influencing a decision.
msewell/agent-stuff · ★ 0 · Data & Documents · score 70
Install: claude install-skill msewell/agent-stuff
# Writing Persuasive Documents Write to change what readers think — not to show what you know. ## Workflow: Writing a new document 1. **Identify specific readers.** Determine what they already believe, what they want solved, what they would doubt, and what language signals value in their world. 2. **Identify the core instability.** Find what is wrong, at risk, or misunderstood — instability is where value lives. 3. **Open with problem + stakes + response.** State the problem within 3 sentences. Show the cost or benefit. State what the document will do about it. No background preamble. 4. **Use tension language.** Lead with *but, however, although, despite, yet, inconsistent, contrary to*. Avoid stability language (*also, furthermore, in addition, moreover*) in the opening. 5. **Show cost of inaction or benefit of action.** Quantify with money, time, risk, or competitive position. Match the framing (cost vs. benefit) to what resonates in the reader's community. 6. **Argue, don't explain.** Anticipate what the reader will doubt and address each doubt directly. Do not narrate your research process. 7. **Address the strongest counterargument.** Acknowledge it, then show why it doesn't hold. This builds trust. 8. **Challenge what's wrong, not what's missing.** "The current approach produces the wrong result" is stronger than "nobody has studied X." 9. **Build evidence toward the claim.** Connect sources to create tension and instability — do not catalogue them neutrally. 10. **