codex-reviewlisted

Iterative code review and planning discussion between the local agent and Codex CLI. Orchestrates an automatic back-and-forth debate where both agents discuss findings, architecture decisions, or implementation plans until reaching consensus. Codex CLI runs READ-ONLY and never modifies files; model and reasoning effort come from the user's local Codex config. Supports plan mode: when the local agent has a plan ready, Codex evaluates and iterates on it before implementation, producing an updated consensus plan. Use when the user asks to review with codex, analyze with codex, discuss code with codex, iterate with codex, consult codex, ask codex, review the plan with codex, validate plan with codex, or any Codex CLI request for code review, architecture review, plan review, or implementation strategy. Does NOT trigger on non-code topics like diet, fitness, writing, life decisions, or general strategy; use codex-discuss for those.
mryll/skills · ★ 4 · AI & Automation · score 78

Install: claude install-skill mryll/skills

# Codex Review — Iterative Consensus Skill Orchestrate an iterative debate between the local agent and Codex CLI until both reach consensus on code review findings, architecture decisions, or implementation plans. **Guiding principle: KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid).** Both sides should favor the simplest solution that works. Complexity must be justified. ## Codex Independence Codex is an **independent reviewer**, not a compliance checker. Do NOT instruct Codex to validate against AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md conventions or treat them as rules to follow. Codex should form its own engineering opinions based on the code/plan it reads. - **The local agent** follows the project's AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md conventions (it already does naturally) - **Codex** reviews with its own engineering judgment — it may agree with, be unaware of, or even challenge AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md conventions - **When they disagree**: the local agent may cite AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md as one argument, but Codex is free to push back if it has a better reasoning. The debate resolves on merits, not authority. - **If truly unresolved**: flag it for the user to decide Give Codex only a brief project description (what it does, tech stack) for context — not a rulebook. ## Codex CLI Configuration - **Model & reasoning effort**: NOT hardcoded — Codex CLI reads them from `~/.codex/config.toml` (top-level `model` and `model_reasoning_effort` keys, or whichever profile is active). Do NOT pass `-m` or `-c model_reasoning_effor