← ClaudeAtlas

claude-reviewlisted

Iterative code review and planning discussion between the local agent and Claude Code CLI. Orchestrates an automatic back-and-forth debate where both agents discuss findings, architecture decisions, or implementation plans until reaching consensus. Claude Code runs READ-ONLY (headless plan mode) and never modifies files; model and effort come from the user's local Claude Code config. Supports plan review: when the local agent has a plan ready, Claude evaluates and iterates on it before implementation, producing an updated consensus plan. Use when the user asks to review with claude, analyze with claude, discuss code with claude, iterate with claude, consult claude, ask claude, review the plan with claude, validate plan with claude, or any Claude Code request for code review, architecture review, plan review, or implementation strategy. Does NOT trigger on non-code topics like diet, fitness, writing, life decisions, or general strategy; use claude-discuss for those.
mryll/skills · ★ 4 · AI & Automation · score 78
Install: claude install-skill mryll/skills
# Claude Review — Iterative Consensus Skill Orchestrate an iterative debate between the local agent (you) and Claude Code CLI (`claude`) until both reach consensus on code review findings, architecture decisions, or implementation plans. **Guiding principle: KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid).** Both sides should favor the simplest solution that works. Complexity must be justified. ## Claude Independence Claude is an **independent reviewer**, not a compliance checker. Do NOT instruct Claude to validate against AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md conventions or treat them as rules to follow. Claude should form its own engineering opinions based on the code/plan it reads. - **The local agent** follows the project's AGENTS.md conventions (it already does naturally) - **Claude** reviews with its own engineering judgment — note that Claude Code auto-loads the project's CLAUDE.md into its context, so it may already know the conventions; it remains free to agree with, ignore, or challenge them - **When they disagree**: the local agent may cite AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md as one argument, but Claude is free to push back if it has better reasoning. The debate resolves on merits, not authority. - **If truly unresolved**: flag it for the user to decide Give Claude only a brief project description (what it does, tech stack) for context — not a rulebook. ## Claude Code CLI Configuration - **Model & effort**: NOT hardcoded — headless `claude -p` uses the model and effort from the user's own Claude Code con