bid-tender-review

Featured

Analyse a construction bid or tender package for scope gaps, risk-shifting exclusions, unit-rate red flags, and front-loading in the schedule of values. Use when asked to review a bid, level bids, check a tender for gaps, compare sub quotes, or vet a schedule of values before award. Produces a structured bid review with a gap register, exclusion risk table, pricing red flags, and an award recommendation with pre-award clarifications.

AI & Automation 1,356 stars 240 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Bid / Tender Review Skill A low bid is only cheap if the scope is actually in it. This skill runs the review an experienced estimator or owner's rep would run before award: reconcile the bid against the bid documents, hunt the exclusions and qualifications that quietly shift risk back to the buyer, test unit rates against sanity ranges, and check the schedule of values for front-loading. The goal is a levelled, apples-to-apples view and a written list of what to clarify **before** signing — not after mobilisation. ## What This Skill Produces - A **scope gap register** — items in the bid documents but missing, excluded, or ambiguous in the bid - An **exclusions & qualifications risk table** — each one classified by who ends up holding the risk - **Pricing red flags** — outlier unit rates, unbalanced line items, allowances hiding real cost - A **front-loading check** on the schedule of values - An **award recommendation** with pre-award clarification questions (RFI-to-bidder list) ## Required Inputs Ask for these if not provided; if working from a thin brief, proceed and label every assumption `[assumed]`: - **The bid/quote itself** (pricing, exclusions, qualifications, allowances, schedule of values if given) - **Scope of work / bid documents** — drawings list, spec sections, or at least a scope narrative - **Contract form and delivery method** (lump sum, GMP, unit price, design-build) — it changes what "excluded" means - **Competing bids** (optional, for levelling) an...

Details

Author
mohitagw15856
Repository
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
HTML
License
MIT

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Data & Documents Listed

bid-gen

Run and improve the bid-gen-v3 engineering bid generation pipeline for Chinese construction tender technical proposals. Use when Codex needs to process a tender/RFP project directory, extract bid requirements, build project_brain/chapter_plan/disqualification_rules, generate or review construction organization design chapters, assemble DOCX output, run compliance/format/similarity gates, debug bid-gen scripts, or apply bid-gen memory feedback.

2 Updated 1 months ago
tiettuo
AI & Automation Featured

bom-cost-review

Review a bill of materials for cost, risk, and supply exposure — cost rollup, top-10 cost drivers, single-source and EOL risk, MOQ vs forecast mismatch, cost-down candidates, and tariff/logistics sensitivity. Use when asked to review a BOM, find cost-down opportunities, check component sourcing risk, or sanity-check BOM cost against target. Produces a structured BOM review with a cost driver Pareto, risk flags per line, and a prioritised cost-down list.

1,356 Updated yesterday
mohitagw15856
AI & Automation Listed

govbid-fit

govbid-fit turns an agency's tacit go/no-go instincts into an explicit, weighted RFP fit-scoring rubric through a guided interview, then applies it to score opportunities. Use it whenever someone is deciding which government or commercial bids, RFPs, or solicitations to pursue versus pass: building or tightening bid-qualification criteria or a go/no-go scorecard, triaging a pipeline of RFPs, scoring opportunities against what the firm usually wins, or asking "should we bid this one" or "is this worth our time." Trigger on the raw pain too, no jargon: "we keep sinking hours into proposals we lose," "help us stop chasing bad RFPs," "what makes a good fit for us." This is bid triage scoring, not defining who to sell to or fundraise from (ideal-customer or target-list work), not writing the proposal, and not scoping an already-won engagement. Live opportunity search from SAM.gov or GovTribe is a separate step (govbid-radar); govbid-fit builds the criteria they get scored against.

0 Updated 1 months ago
chrisgeenyc