ai-eval-plan

Featured

Design an evaluation plan for an LLM or AI feature before shipping it. Use when asked how to evaluate a prompt/model/agent, set up an eval harness, define quality metrics for an AI feature, or build a regression gate. Produces an eval plan — task definition, datasets, metrics & rubrics, baselines, automated + human evals, a pass bar, and a regression gate.

AI & Automation 1,356 stars 240 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# AI Eval Plan Skill You can't improve an AI feature you can't measure, and "it looks good in the demo" is not measurement. This skill produces an evaluation plan that turns a fuzzy quality goal into a repeatable, gated test — so a prompt change that quietly makes outputs worse can't ship. ## Required Inputs Ask for these only if they aren't already provided: - **The feature & task** — what the model does and what "good output" means to a user. - **Failure modes that matter** — what bad looks like (hallucination, wrong format, unsafe, off-tone, too slow). - **Available data** — any real examples, logs, or labelled cases; or note there are none yet. - **Who judges quality** — automated checks, an LLM judge, human raters, or a mix. - **The decision this gates** — ship/no-ship, model selection, or prompt iteration. ## Output Format ### Eval Plan: [feature] **1. What we're measuring** — the task, and a one-line definition of a good vs. bad response. **2. Eval dataset** - **Cases:** how many, where they come from (real logs > synthetic), and how they're split (smoke set vs. full set). - **Coverage:** the slices/scenarios that must be represented (edge cases, adversarial, each major input type). - **Golden answers / references:** present or not, and how they were created. **3. Metrics & rubric** - **Per-dimension scores** — define each dimension (e.g. correctness, grounding, format, safety, tone) on an explicit 1–5 rubric with anchor descriptions, not vibes. - **Automated ...

Details

Author
mohitagw15856
Repository
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
HTML
License
MIT

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

ai-eval-harness

Designs and runs evaluation harnesses for AI features and for agent skills themselves. Use when shipping LLM features or measuring skill quality. Emits EVAL_PLAN / EVAL_REPORT. Never claims production quality from a handful of vibes-only prompts.

0 Updated 1 months ago
willianbs
AI & Automation Listed

ai-feature-eval-harness

Design an evaluation plan for a product AI feature (LLM- or model-backed output): measurable success criteria, a held-out labeled eval dataset shape, per-criterion grading (code-based first, then LLM-based for nuanced judgment), and a pass threshold, then persist as AI_EVAL_PLAN.md. Use when the task ships or changes a feature whose output is model-generated or non-deterministic (assistant reply, classification, extraction, summarization, ranking, agent action) and needs a repeatable dataset-backed eval rather than only example-based tests. Do not use when the feature has no model-backed output (use test-strategy for deterministic behavior), when judging Fhorja's own command outputs against a rubric (use verify-against-rubric), or when no active task folder exists. The code-graded tier composes with ADR-0048 (a passing deterministic gate is Layer-1 evidence); the LLM-graded tier is added signal, not a replacement.

6 Updated 3 weeks ago
Mozurok
AI & Automation Listed

ai-evals

Use when testing an LLM-backed feature, prompt, tool loop or multi-step agent, where the same input can produce different outputs and a prompt or model change can regress behaviour with no code diff. The behaviour spec that precedes the prompt, scenario datasets including adversarial and degradation classes, deterministic assertions over OpenTelemetry traces, calibrated LLM-as-judge, CI gates with baselines, human-in-the-loop, and the production scoring loop that turns incidents into scenarios.

0 Updated 4 days ago
konradcinkusz