council

Solid

Second-opinion advisor. Consults Gemini, Grok, and Kimi in parallel for independent views on hard or high-stakes calls. Two modes: independent (all models see the problem only, reason fresh) and critique (all stress-test a draft). Distinct from /deep-think (Claude reasoning structured, alone) and /odin (Claude + the curated knowledge brain). Trigger when the user says: "council", "/council", "second opinion on", "consult the council", "what would Gemini/Grok/Kimi say about", "stress-test this with Gemini/Grok/Kimi", "council vote".

AI & Automation 10 stars 1 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
35
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Council - Independent Second Opinions (Gemini + Grok + Kimi) Independent second opinions from Gemini, Grok, and Kimi, dispatched in parallel by default. Use when: - The user wants fresh views on a hard call (independent mode) - The user wants a draft stress-tested before it ships (critique mode) This skill is distinct from `/deep-think` (Claude reasoning harder, alone) and `/odin` (Claude + the curated knowledge brain). The unique value here is three models with different training pedigrees, different RLHF, and different failure modes — agreement is stronger evidence; disagreement is itself information. --- ## Phase 0 - Determine mode Read the user's request. CRITIQUE mode if any of: - The user passed `--critique` - The user said "stress-test this", "critique this draft", "find flaws in", "what's wrong with this", "review this draft" - The user pasted a draft (proposal, message, claim) and asked for review INDEPENDENT mode otherwise (default). --- ## Phase 1 - Gather inputs For INDEPENDENT mode, prepare: - `question`: the user's question, cleaned and concrete - `context`: facts the user has shared in this conversation that bear on the question. Important: include the FACTS (numbers, names, dates, constraints), NOT Claude's reasoning or proposed answer. The whole point of independent mode is to give Gemini a clean slate. For CRITIQUE mode, prepare: - `draft`: the exact draft text to critique. If the user passed `--critique 'text'` inline, the draft is the quoted t...

Details

Author
mishahanin
Repository
mishahanin/heading-os
Created
4 weeks ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0

Integrates with

Anthropic · AI

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

council

Gathers N independent, decorrelated perspectives across model families (external CLIs when present, subagents when not) and arbitrates inline. Use when a decision needs genuine debate — not same-model echo — for critique, review, or judge calls. Honest about degradation: never claims 'consensus' from a single model family.

81 Updated 4 days ago
Rune-kit
AI & Automation Solid

konsilium

Council — 5 independent AI perspectives + mutual critique + synthesis (adapted from karpathy/llm-council for Claude Code). For high-stakes decisions where the answer does NOT follow unambiguously from the data — go/no-go before real consequences, critiquing a methodology, choosing between competing approaches, pressure-testing a conclusion you're attached to, designing risk controls. NOT for log/data analysis (the council has no data access) and not for factual lookups. Triggers — "convene the council", "run it past the council", "go/no-go", "pressure-test this".

14 Updated 3 days ago
Sanexxxx777
AI & Automation Solid

council

Pressure-tests high-stakes engineering decisions through 5 advisors with distinct thinking styles — independent analysis, anonymous peer review, chairman synthesis. Use when the user says "council this", "run the council", "pressure-test", "stress-test", "red team this", or "devil's advocate" on a real engineering trade-off. Distinct from strategic-analysis — adds adversarial peer review for decisions where the user suspects their first instinct is biased.

0 Updated today
emrecdr