← ClaudeAtlas

running-a-spikelisted

Answer an open technical question with a time-boxed throwaway experiment instead of arguing or over-building. Use when the team does not know whether an approach will work, which library to pick, or how much a change would cost.
mirzaaghazadeh/StandBye · ★ 6 · AI & Automation · score 75
Install: claude install-skill mirzaaghazadeh/StandBye
# Running a spike A spike is an experiment with a deadline. It exists to replace an opinion with a fact, and its output is a recommendation — not a feature. ## Set it up before you start Write these four lines down first. If you cannot, you are not ready to spike: 1. **The question**, phrased so it has an answer. "Can we stream responses through the existing queue without changing the client?" — not "look into streaming". 2. **What would make it a yes**, and what would make it a no. 3. **The box**: how long, and how much. Say it as a number of minutes or dollars, and honour it. 4. **What you will hand back**: the recommendation and the evidence for it. ## Work like it is disposable, because it is - Build the smallest thing that answers the question. Hardcode. Skip the tests. Skip the error handling. This code is not going to be merged. - Keep it out of the way — a scratch branch or a scratch folder, never mixed into real work. - Go straight at the risky part. If a spike is going to fail, you want it to fail in the first ten minutes, not the last. ## Stop when the box is empty When the time or the budget is gone, stop, even mid-thought. An unfinished spike still has an answer: "we do not know yet, and here is what we learned and what it would take to find out." That is a legitimate result and it is worth reporting. ## Report it Report to whoever asked — the lead with `post_message` or `ask_agent`, the owner with `ask_user` when the decision is theirs. Keep it