← ClaudeAtlas

write-economics-conclusionlisted

Always invoke this skill when the user wants a conclusion, concluding section, final paper section, paper ending, or 结论 for an economics manuscript—including requests to read an empirical, theoretical, or structural economics paper and write a ready-to-use English conclusion. Use it to draft, rewrite, shorten, audit, or fact-check the ending even when the user does not name the skill. It reads the paper body and uses only supported findings, mechanisms, boundaries, and implications. Do not use for general inference questions that do not request a manuscript section.
mimaowang/econ-writing-skills · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 74
Install: claude install-skill mimaowang/econ-writing-skills
# Write an Economics Conclusion Create the clean snapshot a reader should carry away from the paper: what the paper established, why it matters, and where the claim stops. Synthesize rather than repeat. Treat every extension beyond the results—mechanism, external validity, policy, and future work—as evidence-dependent. ## Load the required knowledge Before drafting, rewriting, or auditing, read all four references: 1. `references/evidence-protocol.md` — manuscript reading, evidence ledger, causal language, conflicts, and missing information. 2. `references/conclusion-knowledge.md` — the complete guide-derived principles, rationales, conditions, and anti-patterns. 3. `references/composition-and-length.md` — module selection, natural order, transitions, paper-type branches, and elastic length. 4. `references/quality-and-sources.md` — final audit, scoring rules, Top Five calibration, and provenance. These references are mandatory. Follow the target journal and any separate Discussion-section convention before applying default length guidance. ## Non-negotiable rules - Base the conclusion on claims delivered by the manuscript body, not merely promised in the introduction. - Never add a result, coefficient, mechanism, limitation, citation, counterfactual, future project, or policy claim that the supplied material does not support. - Distinguish identified mechanisms, model-implied mechanisms, evidence consistent with a channel, suggestive evidence, and author speculation. -