← ClaudeAtlas

propose-economics-paper-titleslisted

Always invoke this skill for ANY request to write, propose, choose, rank, rewrite, compare, or audit an economics paper title—including 中文 requests for 论文标题, 英文标题, 标题候选, 推荐标题, or 备选标题. Invoke it when the user asks for one recommended English title plus alternatives from an empirical, theoretical, or structural economics manuscript, even if the skill is not named. It reads the paper body and treats every displayed title as a factual promise. Do not use for section, table, figure, news, or book titles.
mimaowang/econ-writing-skills · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 74
Install: claude install-skill mimaowang/econ-writing-skills
# Propose Economics Paper Titles Design accurate, distinctive, concise English titles that compress what the paper is and make an honest promise to the right reader. Generate diversity by changing information architecture, not by swapping synonyms in one template. ## Load the required knowledge Before proposing, rewriting, or auditing titles, read all four references: 1. `references/evidence-protocol.md` — manuscript reading, evidence ledger, causal language, conflicts, and missing information. 2. `references/title-knowledge.md` — the complete guide-derived principles, rationales, title families, exceptions, and anti-patterns. 3. `references/composition-and-length.md` — candidate generation, ranking, promise audits, length, and paper-type adaptations. 4. `references/quality-and-sources.md` — final scoring, Top Five calibration, and provenance. These references are mandatory. If the user supplies a journal style or title-length rule, follow it. ## Non-negotiable rules - Read enough of the paper body to determine the central object, relationship or task, evidence strength, contribution, and necessary scope. - Treat every content word as a promise the body must deliver. - Never add causal language, a mechanism, a general scope, a result direction, a novelty claim, or a design label without support. - Treat gerunds and nominalized actions as factual claims. `Reducing`, `Improving`, `Removing`, and similar openings presuppose the intervention changed that object; supportive