do-your-research-deeplisted

Escalate research discipline to a heavy verification fan-out over a TYPED FULL INVENTORY of the session's claims — assumptions, asserted facts, concrete specifics (paths, defaults, flags, signatures), and load-bearing premises — verifying each against a primary source at a configurable depth (tiered by default, or full), then report a per-item ledger with verdict, source, source tier, consensus count, and recency. Use when: 'deep research pass', 'verify every claim', 'audit all our claims', 'fact-check everything', 'fact-check all these claims', 'go make sure those are all right', 'we've made a lot of load-bearing claims', or when your own judgement is the suspected bias across many claims. For a single or small inline fact-check ('fact-check that'), use the sibling do-your-research.
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins · ★ 13 · AI & Automation · score 73

Install: claude install-skill melodic-software/claude-code-plugins

# Do your research — deep The verification-fan-out tier of the sibling `/discipline:do-your-research`. Same research discipline; heavier execution. Where the base skill re-anchors and audits inline in the current context, this one enumerates a TYPED FULL INVENTORY of the session's claims and verifies them against primary sources — the execution tier the base skill's context cannot provide from within itself. The shared method — re-anchor, audit, correct forward, report, and the tone that firing this is not an accusation — lives in [`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/context/re-anchor-audit-correct.md`](../../context/re-anchor-audit-correct.md). The discipline this re-anchors and its portable baseline live in the sibling [`do-your-research`](../do-your-research/SKILL.md). Read both; this file adds only the fan-out delta. There is no separate copy of the discipline here — update the sibling and this tier follows. ## When this tier, not the inline audit Reserve the fan-out for when the accumulated claims are load-bearing enough to justify the subagent cost: a long session with many concrete specifics the rest of the work now rests on, a "fact-check everything" request that wants provable coverage, or where your own judgement is the suspected source of bias across many claims — a self-check in the context that produced the claims is weak by construction. For a single unbacked claim or a short session, the inline audit in the sibling is the right tool; this tier is overkill. ## Verificat