dialecticlisted

# dialectic — three independent minds, sublated to convergence Run a Hegelian/Socratic loop over a question using **three persistent subagents**. The orchestrator (you) is the conductor: you spawn the three, relay *only distilled messages* between them, emit a running digest, and detect convergence. Genuine dialectic seeks a commonly-held truth, not a winner — no rhetoric, no scoring, just position → contradiction → sublation. ## The three roles (independent, with per-role memory) Three roles — Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis (`subagent_type: general-purpose`). There is no live persistent agent across rounds; instead you **re-spawn a fresh agent each round and replay that role's own prior turns into its prompt**, so each role accumulates memory of *its own* line of argument without ever seeing the others' reasoning. - **Thesis** — proposes a position and its support. - **Antithesis** — attacks it: strongest objection, the contradiction, the missing case, or a Socratic question that exposes a weak assumption. - **Synthesis** — *sublates*: keeps what survives, drops what broke, forms a new position. > Mechanism note: `SendMessage`-based live continuation is unavailable in this harness. > Re-spawn + own-history-replay is equivalent for this protocol, since roles exchange only > final messages, never internal thoughts — and you keep a per-role transcript of past > turns to paste back in. ## The critical isolation rule The three must be **independent thinkers**. They never