← ClaudeAtlas

map-agency-question-evidencelisted

Triages a received health-authority information request into atomic answerable units and maps each unit to its source evidence, its gaps, and a proposed owner, with completeness reported as a fraction against both the request itself and the standard clinical pharmacology question battery. Use this skill when someone asks to break down, triage, map, track or check coverage of an agency question, information request, list of questions, request for supplementary information or meeting-minute action — for example "split this IR into answerable parts and tell me what evidence we already have" or "check our draft response cites something that actually resolves". Do not use for preparing a briefing package we choose to send, for authoring the scientific answer to a question, for deciding which of two conflicting values is correct, or for predicting what an authority will ask next.
malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skills · ★ 6 · AI & Automation · score 77
Install: claude install-skill malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skills
# Agency Question Evidence Map Take an information request that has already arrived from a health authority, break it into units that can each be answered and evidenced on their own, and map every unit to the document, version and locator that answers it — or record that nothing does. Produce a decomposition register, an evidence map, a gap and owner register, and a completeness memo stating coverage as a fraction, for a qualified clinical pharmacologist and the accountable regulatory owner to work from. **This skill structures and traces. It never writes the scientific answer, never decides which of two conflicting values is correct, and never makes or implies a commitment to the authority.** ## Who this is for Clinical pharmacology leads assembling a response to an agency question · regulatory affairs coordinators tracking which questions have evidence and which have owners · reviewers checking a drafted response before it enters the approval chain. ## When to use this skill Use when a request has **already been received** and the immediate problem is working out what it is actually asking and what evidence already exists: - "Split this information request into answerable parts and tell me what evidence we already have for each" - "Question 4 has three asks buried in one sentence — separate them" - "Which of these questions have no source we can cite yet, and who owns them?" - "Check the draft response: does every claim carry a citation that resolves?" - "We answer