rate-cvlisted

# rate-cv **Read the CV's field before scoring.** The rubric is weighted for leadership CVs in any profession: 55 of the 100 points are domain-neutral and the rest have a mapping table for what counts as evidence in engineering, clinical, teaching, finance and operations roles. Name the domain you scored against in the output. A score produced against a rubric you quietly adapted looks comparable to other scores and is not. Score a CV honestly and specifically, then hand back a number that's auditable and fixes that are actionable. Two modes: - **Standalone quality** (no JD): how strong is this CV for engineering-leadership roles, and what would raise it. - **Targeted match** (JD supplied): the above **plus** a separate ATS keyword match and qualification-fit read against that job. The number is a sanity check, not truth — real ATS platforms don't emit a score a recruiter sees, and web tools disagree by ~20 points on the same file. So always lead with the breakdown and the fixes, and say what the score does and doesn't mean. ## Hard rules - **Never coach toward fabrication.** If a job description wants a keyword the candidate can't truthfully claim, report it as a gap; do not suggest inventing experience, titles, or scope. This is the line that separates honest CV help from the tools that quietly tell people to lie. - **Watch for AI-slop** in anything you rewrite: clustered em-dashes, rule-of-three everywhere, tidy-list-with-payoff cadence. If a `natural-writing` skill i