jotbook-pencil-reviewlisted

# Review the pencil backlog The user is reviewing the pencils (provisional long-form drafts) to decide which are worth promoting to inked entries, which need a revise pass, and which should be dropped. Your job is to **surface and recommend** — never delete, promote, or regenerate unilaterally. Every action needs explicit confirmation. ## Resolve configuration Read `.claude/jotbook.local.md` if present. From its frontmatter, extract: | field | default | meaning | |---|---|---| | `pencils_dir` | `docs/jotbook/_pencils/` | where pencils live | | `jots_dir` | `docs/jotbook/_jots/` | needed to verify source-jot existence | If `pencils_dir` doesn't exist or contains no pencils, report that in one line and stop. ## Procedure ### 1. Inventory List every `*.md` and `*.html` file under `pencils_dir` (excluding any `README.md`). For each: - Read the metadata block — YAML frontmatter for `.md` pencils, the top HTML comment for `.html` pencils. Extract: - `status` (should be `pencil` — flag anything else as suspicious) - `drafted:` date - `revised:` date (if present) - `from_jots:` list - Compute age as today − (most recent of `revised`, `drafted`). - Check that each entry in `from_jots:` still resolves to a real file in `jots_dir`. Note any missing source jots — the pencil can still be promoted, but its source-jot cleanup will be partial. - Record the format (`md` or `html`). Sort by age, oldest first. ### 2. Present Output a compact, scannable summary. Don't over-fo