design-widelisted

# design-wide — ADHD diverge → focus → designs/<slug>.md draft ## AUDIENCE Skill body ∈ SPEC-ADJACENT ∴ glyph register. Design file output (`designs/<slug>.md`) ≡ user-reviewing surface pre-spec-fold ∴ steno register (readable symbols `→ & | §`, ⊥ heavy math glyphs `∀ ∃ ∴ ⊥ ∈ ∉`). Encoding follows audience. ## Position vs sibling `design` skill Output contract identical to `design`: writes `designs/<slug>.md` (steno), converges on `## Open Questions` ∅, design-file lifecycle managed by `/sdd:spec` fold-in (deletes draft post-apply per design-lifecycle invariant ∈ SPEC.md). Trigger surface separate (`/sdd:design-wide`). Internals differ at step 2 only: where `design` proposes shape in 1 pass from user framing, `design-wide` mechanically diverges across N=5 vantage frames in isolation, then mechanically scores ∧ clusters → top-3 seeds `## Proposal` as A | B | C alternatives. Both skills coexist pending A/B comparison; same fold-in path ∀ either output file. ## Loop 1. read `SPEC.md` ∈ root → degrade gracefully if absent 2. **diverge → focus** (per ADHD protocol below; replaces single-pass propose-shape) 3. surface `## Proposal` w/ A | B | C labeled alternatives + `## Open Questions` list at bottom 4. wait → user critique / answers / pick 5. update Proposal in place; resolved Qs → `## Design decisions` w/ rationale; user may narrow to one alternative ∨ keep all three pending convergence 6. repeat 4–5 until `## Open Questions` ∅ 7. on confirm → write draft to `designs/<sl