← ClaudeAtlas

brieflisted

Produce the decision brief from a Requivo session's current understanding, using this Claude session for the judgment, and save it as a tracked document tied to the revision it was written from. Use when the questions have been worked through and the user needs something to review before estimating or committing to the scope.
jbkkz/requivo · ★ 2 · AI & Automation · score 71
Install: claude install-skill jbkkz/requivo
# /requivo:brief Write the **decision brief** — what someone needs to review with a client, a product lead or an engineering lead *before* estimating this request. A judgment, not a recap, and not a PRD. **You** do the analysis; Requivo tracks the document. Read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/REASONING.md` first. ## 0. Preflight Run the shared **preflight** from REASONING.md before anything else: `requivo doctor --json`, checking whether the command ran *at all* rather than what it reported. If it could not run, the `requivo` CLI is not installed — say the four things REASONING.md lists and stop. Nothing has been applied or saved at this point, so there is no half-written brief to find. ## 1. Check readiness, honestly ``` requivo status <slug> --json ``` Note the `revision` — call it `N`. It is the understanding this brief will rest on, and you will state it when you save. If high-impact topics are still unresolved, **say so up front**. A brief written on a thin understanding must flag its assumptions — never present an inferred topic or an open decision as settled. ## 2. Load the model ``` requivo model show <slug> requivo context --session <slug> # exactly the cards this session was created with ``` ## 3. Reason → write the brief Produce it in PM language, in the order a scope review is run: 1. **Request and objective** — the underlying problem, what is being built, complexity and its cost driver. 2. **Current understanding** — the scope in a short paragraph. 3. **What is