research-criticlisted
Install: claude install-skill jajupmochi/claude-config
# /research-critic
Adversarial review of the inferential chain BEFORE a claim is published.
## Master TOC
- [Core principle](#core-principle)
- [When to invoke](#when-to-invoke)
- [The Six-Question Audit](#the-six-question-audit)
- [Anti-bias checklist](#anti-bias-checklist)
- [Output format when critic flags an issue](#output-format-when-critic-flags-an-issue)
- [Quick check (single line)](#quick-check-single-line)
- [Anti-rationalisation](#anti-rationalisation)
- [Companion](#companion)
## Core principle
A real experiment can still be *interpreted* wrongly. Numbers don't speak for themselves — they require a chain of inference from {data, method, comparison} to {claim}. **Each link is a place to lie to yourself.** This skill challenges each link adversarially before the claim is published.
## When to invoke
Before ANY of:
- Writing a result line in a paper draft / RESULTS.md
- Closing an experiment ticket as "done"
- Adding a number to a table or figure
- Saying "our method beats X" or "our method matches Y"
- Concluding from an ablation
- Committing a "headline" milestone in git
- Sharing results with a collaborator / advisor
## The Six-Question Audit
Run all six. Each `NO` answer is a STOP — fix before claiming.
### Q1. Is the hypothesis falsifiable?
| Sufficient | Insufficient |
|---|---|
| "Method X lifts metric Y by ≥ Z pp over baseline on dataset D, N folds" | "Method X improves Y" (improves how? on what?) |
| "Coverage matches target 1−α within Δ across α