graph-of-thoughtlisted

Advanced ideation and problem-solving using the Graph of Thoughts (GoT) technique. Use when the user wants deep, interconnected exploration where ideas are combined, refined, and aggregated — not just branched and pruned. Triggers include "graph of thought", "GoT analysis", "combine approaches", "aggregate ideas", "interconnected thinking", "synthesise multiple angles", "cross-pollinate ideas", "merge the best parts", "hybrid solution", or complex challenges where the best answer combines elements from multiple reasoning paths. Also use for systems design, strategy with many interdependencies, multi-stakeholder trade-offs, or wicked problems needing fused partial solutions. Prefer over tree-of-thought when the user wants ideas merged rather than compared and selected.
jacarty/claude-toolkit · ★ 0 · Code & Development · score 68

Install: claude install-skill jacarty/claude-toolkit

# Graph of Thoughts — Interconnected Ideation & Problem Solving ## What This Skill Does This skill applies the **Graph of Thoughts (GoT)** framework to explore a problem space as a **directed graph** rather than a tree. Where Tree of Thought branches and prunes to find the best single path, GoT allows reasoning chains to **merge, aggregate, refine, and loop back** — producing hybrid solutions that combine the strongest elements from multiple lines of thinking. The key operations that distinguish GoT from ToT: - **Branching** — splitting a thought into multiple parallel explorations (same as ToT) - **Aggregating chains** — merging insights from separate reasoning paths into a combined solution - **Aggregating thoughts** — fusing individual ideas from different branches into new composite thoughts - **Refining** — looping back to improve an earlier thought using insights gained later - **Backtracking** — returning to a prior node when a path stalls, carrying forward what was learned ## When to Use GoT vs ToT | Signal | Use ToT | Use GoT | |--------|---------|---------| | "Which option should I pick?" | ✓ | | | "How can I combine the best of both?" | | ✓ | | Problem has clear, mutually exclusive paths | ✓ | | | Problem has interdependent, overlapping concerns | | ✓ | | User wants a ranked comparison | ✓ | | | User wants a hybrid or synthesised solution | | ✓ | | Simple decision with 2-4 clear options | ✓ | | | Wicked problem, systems design, multi-stakeholder | | ✓ | | Use