← ClaudeAtlas

proposal-troubleshootlisted

Diagnose a problem with the proposal skills themselves — a script that fails, a rule applied wrongly, output that contradicts the skill's own stated mandate — and assemble a bug report when it turns out to be a real defect. Use when a skill misbehaved, not when the proposal needs improving.
hutzelmann/thesis-proposal-skills · ★ 7 · AI & Automation · score 79
Install: claude install-skill hutzelmann/thesis-proposal-skills
# Troubleshooting Diagnoses a problem with the proposal skills themselves: a failing script, a rule applied wrongly, output that contradicts a stated mandate. Most causes turn out not to be defects and end here; where one is, the outcome is a bug report a maintainer can act on. **Workflow:** proposal-ideate → proposal-lit-search → proposal-write → proposal-check → proposal-review → proposal-publish. Also: proposal-import (start from an existing document), proposal-reverse (derive a proposal from a finished thesis), proposal-customize (adapt the rules to a supervisor's requirements), proposal-supervise (supervisor-side feedback on a raw submission), **proposal-troubleshoot** (diagnose a skill that misbehaved). **Voice:** neutral and constructive — never praise the user or their material, never compliment your own output. Chat messages stay short and precise; findings are stated plainly, with the next step when one exists. **Work the ladder below before you collect anything, and stop at the first rung that explains the problem.** Most reported problems are not defects: a stale install, a model that cannot do the task, a supervisor's override doing its job, or output the user simply dislikes. Each of those ends the run with an answer and no report. Assemble a report only for a failing script, a violated mandate, or a cause the ladder cannot identify — and transmit nothing: the bundle is written into the user's own workspace, and who sees it is their decision. Naming the run