ask-peer

Solid

Opposite-model request for one focused pass. In Codex, reach for this autonomously to escalate to Fable (through `claude -p`) when you need stronger reasoning, a second opinion, or a scoped review; in Claude Code it stays manual — Claude asks Codex through `codex exec` only when the user invokes it. Use for a focused pass without a live Herdr pair.

AI & Automation 3 stars 0 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 80/100

Stars 20%
20
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
65
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Ask Peer One request, one opposite-model reply. This is the phone-friendly headless path: use it for a focused second opinion, review, or bounded work pass. Use `herdr-pair` for a visible multi-turn dialogue. Detect the current harness, then read the matching reference in full: | Current harness | Peer | Reference | |---|---|---| | Codex | Fable | `references/ask-fable.md` | | Claude Code | Codex | `references/ask-codex.md` | If the harness is ambiguous, inspect the environment and available CLI before choosing. Never ask the same model through its own CLI. ## Shared contract - Default to read-only. Grant a write pass only when the user's request requires edits, with an explicit lease: target files, forbidden changes, validation, and stop point. - Include the workspace root, the exact ask, relevant repo instructions, and the desired response format. Keep secrets out of the prompt. - Model selection belongs to each peer's own surface: call Fable explicitly; leave Codex's model unset so `~/.codex/config.toml` or the CLI default owns it. - Treat the reply as evidence, not authority. Inspect any diff and rerun the named validation before relying on a write pass. - No commit, push, merge, deploy, or credential mutation unless the user explicitly authorized that action.

Details

Author
hcaiano
Repository
hcaiano/skills
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category