seven-pass-reviewlisted

<!-- Adapted from pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (MIT), https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --> # Seven-Pass Adversarial Review Runs seven independent reviewers, each focused on a single lens, then synthesizes their findings into one prioritized revision plan. Pattern 15 from the workflow guide, mechanized. **Why seven passes?** A single-agent review blends lenses and softens each one. Seven forked agents each approach the paper with full context budget for their own lens, then a synthesizer resolves conflicts and de-duplicates. > **When to pick this over `/review-paper`:** This skill costs roughly 7× more tokens than `/review-paper` (default) and ~2× more than `/review-paper --adversarial`. Use it when the paper is submission-ready or at R&R stage and you need maximum lens coverage. For early drafts or iterative work, `/review-paper` is the right tool. For journal-simulation pressure test, use `/review-paper --peer <journal>` instead. ## Inputs - `$0` — manuscript path (`.tex`, `.qmd`, `.md`, or `.pdf`). Required. ## The Seven Lenses Each lens runs as a **forked subagent** (context: fork) so the main conversation stays clean. | # | Lens | Focus | Agent type | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | Abstract audit | Does the abstract state the question, method, result, and contribution? Does it match the paper? | general-purpose | | 2 | Intro structure | Does the intro follow Cochrane / Varian framework? Literature placement? Contribution clarity? | general-purp